ArticleJournal of virology1996
The v-erbB oncogene confers enhanced cellular susceptibility to reovirus infection.
Article in Journal of virology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phase I/II trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy in combination with intravenous oncolytic reovirus in patients with advanced malignancies.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2012Trial
- Human Melanoma and Glioblastoma Cells Express Cathepsins Supporting Reovirus Moscow Strain Infection.Viruses · 2024Article
- Oncolytic Virotherapy: A New Paradigm in Cancer Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Reovirus combined with a STING agonist enhances anti-tumor immunity in a mouse model of colorectal cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Oncolytic virus treatment differentially affects the CD56Immunology · 2022Article
- Oncolytic virus therapy in cancer: A current review.World journal of virology · 2021Review
- Past, Present and Future of Oncolytic Reovirus.Cancers · 2020Review
- Elucidation of Pelareorep Pharmacodynamics in A Phase I Trial in Patients withMolecular cancer therapeutics · 2020Article
- Reovirus Neurotropism and Virulence Are Dictated by Sequences in the Head Domain of the Viral Attachment Protein.Journal of virology · 2018Article
- Review
- Current understanding of reovirus oncolysis mechanisms.Oncolytic virotherapy · 2018Review
- Anti-tumor efficacy of oncolytic reovirus against gastrointestinal stromal tumor cells.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) and Other Oncolytic Viruses for the Treatment of Melanoma.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2017Review
- Oncolytic virotherapy for urological cancers.Nature reviews. Urology · 2016Review
- Clinical development of reovirus for cancer therapy: An oncolytic virus with immune-mediated antitumor activity.World journal of methodology · 2016Review
- Article
- The oncolytic virus, pelareorep, as a novel anticancer agent: a review.Investigational new drugs · 2015Review
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have previously demonstrated that two mouse cell lines that are poorly infectible by reovirus become highly susceptible upon transfection with the gene encoding the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (J. E. Strong, D. Tang, and P. W. K. Lee, Virology 197:405-411, 1993). This enhancement of infection efficiency requires a functional EGFR, since such an enhancement is not observed in cells expressing a mutated (kinase-inactive) EGFR. The additional finding that reovirus is capable of directly binding to the N-terminal ectodomain of the EGFR (D. Tang, J. E. Strong, and P. W. K. Lee, Virology 197:412-414, 1993) has led us to question whether this interaction is required for the activation of a signalling cascade that somehow augments the ensuing infection process. In the present study, we address this question, using cells transfected with the v-erbB oncogene, which encodes a protein structurally related to the EGFR but lacking a large portion of the N-terminal ligand-binding domain. The v-erbB protein also possesses ligand-independent, constitutive tyrosine kinase activity. Control NIH 3T3 cells, which are poorly infectible by reovirus (serotype 3, strain Dearing), and NIH 3T3 cells transfected with the v-erbB oncogene (THC-11) were assayed for their susceptibilities to reovirus infection. Infectivity was determined by immunofluorescent detection of viral proteins, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis of radiolabeled cells, and plaque titration. All three assays demonstrated a drastically higher degree of susceptibility to infection in the THC-11 cell line. This enhanced susceptibility was found to be abrogated by treatment of the cells with genistein, an inhibitor of tyrosine protein kinases, but only partially by treatment with daidzein, an inactive analog of genistein. We propose that the mechanism of enhancement of infection efficiency conferred by EGFR and v-erbB is through the opportunistic utilization by the virus of an already activated signal transduction pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.