Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8522323›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics1995

Complete and precise characterization of marker chromosomes by application of microdissection in prenatal diagnosis.

J Müller-Navia, A Nebel, E Schleiermacher

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular-cytogenetic characterization of the origin and the presence of pericentromeric euchromatin on minute supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2004
    Article
  4. Generation of chromosome painting probes from single chromosomes by laser microdissection and linker-adaptor PCR.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2004
    Article
  5. The use of laser microdissection for the preparation of chromosome-specific painting probes in farm animals.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2002
    Article
  6. Multiplex-FISH for pre- and postnatal diagnostic applications.American journal of human genetics · 1999
    Article
  7. An easy and reliable procedure of microdissection technique for the analysis of chromosomal breakpoints and marker chromosomes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 1999
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Müller-NaviaInstitut für Anthropologie, Universität Mainz, Germany.
A Nebel
E Schleiermacher
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A straightforward and extremely efficient reverse chromosome painting technique is described which allows the rapid and unequivocal identification of any cytogenetically unclassifiable chromosome rearrangement. This procedure is used to determine the origin of unknown marker chromosomes found at prenatal diagnosis. After microdissection of the marker chromosome and amplification of the dissected fragment by a degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction (DOP-PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to aberrant and normal metaphase chromosomes with the marker-derived probe pool is performed. With this strategy, marker chromosomes present in amniotic fluid samples were successfully identified in three cases. The origin of the supernumerary markers was ascertained as deriving from 3p(p12-cen), 18p(pter-cen) and 9p(p12-cen), respectively. Since a specific FISH signal on chromosomes can be obtained within 2 working days using a probe generated without any pretreatment from one chromosomal fragment only and without additional image processing devices, this technique is considered to be highly suitable for routine application in pre- and postnatal cytogenetic analysis.

Indexed as

AmniocentesisChromosomes, Human, Pair 18Chromosomes, Human, Pair 3Chromosomes, Human, Pair 9AdultAmniotic FluidBase SequenceChromosome BandingChromosome MappingDissectionDNA PrimersFemaleGenetic MarkersHumansInfant, NewbornIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceDNA PrimersGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID8522323
OpenAlexW2070078989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.