ArticleHuman genetics1995
Detection of chromosome aberrations in paraffin sections of seven gonadal yolk sac tumors of childhood.
Article in Human genetics, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular characteristics of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors and comparison with testicular counterparts: implications for pathogenesis.Endocrine reviews · 2013Review
- Germinoma in the basal ganglia with an abnormal karyotype: case report and review of the literature.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2010Review
- Malignant germ cell tumours of childhood: new associations of genomic imbalance.British journal of cancer · 2007Article
- Hypermethylation of the RUNX3 gene promoter in testicular yolk sac tumor of infants.The American journal of pathology · 2003Article
- Interphase cytogenetics on paraffin sections of paediatric extragonadal yolk sac tumours.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 1996Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Yolk sac tumors are the most frequent kind of malignant pediatric germ cell tumor and may have a fundamentally different pathogenesis than adult germ cell tumors. Since few cytogenetic studies have been performed so far, in situ hybridization was applied to interphase cell nuclei of seven gonadal yolk sac tumors of childhood in routine paraffin-embedded tissue sections. The panel of chromosome-specific DNA probes was selected on the basis of their relevance in adult germ cell tumors and consisted of five DNA probes specific for the (peri)centromeric regions of chromosomes 1, 8, 12, 17 and/or X and/or one DNA probe specific for the subtelomeric region of chromosome 1 (p36.3). As in adult germ cell tumors, all pediatric gonadal yolk sac tumors had an increased incidence of numerical chromosome aberrations. All tumors showed an overrepresentation of at least three chromosomes. Gains of chromosome 12, which is highly specific in adult germ cell tumors, were diagnosed in six pediatric gonadal yolk sac tumors. The DNA indices determined in the paraffin-embedded tumor material correlated well with the in situ hybridization findings. A chromosome was either over- or underrepresented, compared with the corresponding DNA indices, in only a few cases. The short arm of chromosome 1 in adult germ cell tumors is often involved in structural aberrations. In pediatric germ cell tumors, the short arm of chromosome 1 is also a nonrandom site of structural aberrations. Moreover, the presence of a deletion at 1p36.3 in four out of five tumors suggests that the loss of gene(s) in this region is an important event in the pathogenesis of gonadal yolk sac tumors of childhood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.