Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8520970›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)1995

Electrophoretic screening for human apolipoprotein C-II variants: repeated identification of apolipoprotein C-II(K19T).

H Wiebusch, J R Nofer, A von Eckardstein, H Funke, U Wahrburg, H Martin, E Köhler, G Assmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H WiebuschInstitut für Arterioskleroseforschung, Universität Münster, Germany.
J R Nofer
A von Eckardstein
H Funke
U Wahrburg
H Martin
E Köhler
G Assmann
University of Münster · DEZentrallaboratorium Deutscher Apotheker · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening for apolipoprotein (apo) C-II variants in the plasma of 400 students, 600 patients of a cardiological rehabilitation center, and 1200 patients of an outpatient lipid clinic by isoelectric focusing and subsequent anti-apo C-II immunoblotting led to the identification of four individuals whose plasma samples contained an apo C-II isoform with an abnormal isoelectric point. In all cases direct sequencing of PCR-amplified DNA assessed a heterozygous A to C transversion in codon 19 of the apo C-II gene which leads to the replacement of lysine with threonine. Two of the four index patients presented with moderate hypertriglyceridemia; one suffered from severe hyperlipidemia, with triglyceride levels ranging between 180 and 1900 mg/dl, depending on dietary changes. Sequencing of this proband's lipoprotein lipase gene showed no alteration compared to the wild-type sequence. A study in his family revealed that heterozygosity for apo C-II(K19T) is not associated with differences in mean lipid and lipoprotein concentrations. In conclusion, apo C-II(K19T) occurs in Germany at a frequency of approximately 1 in 550. Although this variant is not sufficient to cause hypertriglyceridemia, it may be possible that apo C-II(K19T) cause hypertriglyceridemia in the presence of additional as yet unidentified environmental and/or genetic factors.

Indexed as

AdultAmino Acid SequenceApolipoprotein C-IIApolipoproteins CBase SequenceGenetic VariationHeterozygoteHumansHypercholesterolemiaHypertriglyceridemiaIsoelectric FocusingMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Sequence DataApolipoprotein C-IIapolipoprotein C-II (Toronto)Apolipoproteins C

Identifiers

PMID8520970
OpenAlexW1986016848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.