Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8520399›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1995

The effects of fundholding in general practice on prescribing habits three years after introduction of the scheme.

S Stewart-Brown, R Surender, J Bradlow, A Coulter, H Doll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. The impact of physician-level drug budgets on prescribing behavior.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Do clinical guidelines reduce clinician dependent costs?Health research policy and systems · 2011
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The impact of a general practice group intervention on prescribing costs and patterns.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  9. The abolition of the GP fundholding scheme: a lesson in evidence-based policy making.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A healthy disposition? The use and limitations of the characteristics approach to general practice research.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2001
    Article
  12. Article
  13. A comparison of three methods of setting prescribing budgets, using data derived from defined daily dose analyses of historic patterns of use.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Fundholding in the south Thames Region.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1997
    Article
  18. Prescribing behaviour in general practice: the impact of promoting therapeutically equivalent cheaper medicines.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1997
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S Stewart-BrownDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Infirmary.
R Surender
J Bradlow
A Coulter
H Doll

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo observe changes in prescribing practice that occurred after the introduction of fundholding in first wave practices and to contrast these with changes occurring in similar non-fundholding practices.

designProspective observational study.

settingOxford region fundholding study. SUBJECTS: Eight first wave fundholding practices and five practices that were not interested in fundholding in 1990-1, which were similar in terms of practice size, training status, locality, and urban rural mix. Three of the fundholding and none of the non-fundholding practices were dispensing practices.

main outcome measuresChanges in prescribing practice as measured by net cost per prescribing unit, cost per item, number of items prescribed, and substitution rates for generic drugs three years after the introduction of fundholding. Data for fundholding practices were analysed separately according to whether they were dispensing or non-dispensing practices.

resultsPrescribing costs rose by a third or more in all types of practice. The patterns of change observed in this cohort after one year of fundholding were reversed. No evidence existed that fundholding had controlled prescribing costs among non-dispensing fundholders; costs among dispensing fundholders rose least, but the differences were small compared with the overall increase in costs.

conclusionsEarly reports of the effectiveness of fundholding in curbing prescribing costs have not been confirmed in this longer term study.

Indexed as

Financing, GovernmentPractice Patterns, Physicians'Drug CostsDrug PrescriptionsEnglandFamily PracticeHumansProspective StudiesState Medicine

Identifiers

PMID8520399
PMCPMC2548182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.