Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8520341›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1995

Is tuberculosis taken seriously in the United Kingdom?

M R Evans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ethnic differences in the rates of BCG vaccination.Archives of disease in childhood · 2004
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Management of tuberculosis in Wales: 1986-92.Archives of disease in childhood · 1998
    Article
  4. Tuberculosis among homeless people.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 1996
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Directly observed therapy for tuberculosis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M R EvansDepartment of Public Health Medicine, South Glamorgan Health Authority, Cardiff, Wales.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis has been the subject of much concern in recent years. Notifications have increased, inadequacies in surveillance revealed, and policies for BCG immunisation and screening of immigrants questioned. Until recently the disease was given low priority in the United Kingdom. There is no overall strategic framework for tackling tuberculosis, and fears have been expressed about the future of local tuberculosis control programmes in the new market economy of the NHS. An action plan for tuberculosis within the context of a national programme is urgently required. Only then will a major impact on the incidence of the disease be seen.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlDisease NotificationEmigration and ImmigrationHealth PolicyHumansImmunization ProgramsIncidenceTuberculosisUnited KingdomUnited States

Identifiers

PMID8520341
PMCPMC2543718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.