Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8520339›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1995

Do clinical guidelines introduced with practice based education improve care of asthmatic and diabetic patients? A randomised controlled trial in general practices in east London.

G Feder, C Griffiths, C Highton, S Eldridge, M Spence, L Southgate

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of the implementation and impact of asthma protocols.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Effectiveness of disease-management programs for improving diabetes care: a meta-analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2011
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Recommendations for future studies: a systematic review of educational interventions in primary care settings.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1999
    Pooled it
  10. Canadian Asthma Consensus Report, 1999. Canadian Asthma Consensus Group.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 1999
    Guideline
  11. General practitioners' continuing education: a review of policies, strategies and effectiveness, and their implications for the future.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998
    Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Multifaceted support to improve preventive cardiovascular care: a nationwide, controlled trial in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2003
    Trial
  18. Cluster randomised controlled trial of an educational outreach visit to improve influenza and pneumococcal immunisation rates in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Trial
  19. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of a prompt and reminder card in the care of people with epilepsy.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

G FederDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, St Bartholomew's and Royal London Hospital Medical College, UK.
C Griffiths
C Highton
S Eldridge
M Spence
L Southgate

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether locally developed guidelines on asthma and diabetes disseminated through practice based education improve quality of care in non-training, inner city general practices.

designRandomised controlled trial with each practice receiving one set of guidelines but providing data on the management of both conditions. SUBJECTS: 24 inner city, non-training general practices.

settingEast London.

main outcome measuresRecording of key variables in patient records (asthma: peak flow rate, review of inhaler technique, review of asthma symptoms, prophylaxis, occupation, and smoking habit; diabetes: blood glucose concentration, glycaemic control, funduscopy, feet examination, weight, and smoking habit); size of practice disease registers; prescribing in asthma; and use of structured consultation "prompts."

resultsIn practices receiving diabetes guidelines, significant improvements in recording were seen for all seven diabetes variables. Both groups of practices showed improved recording of review of inhaler technique, smoking habit, and review of asthma symptoms. In practices receiving asthma guidelines, further improvement was seen only in recording of review of inhaler technique and quality of prescribing in asthma. Sizes of disease registers were unchanged. The use of structured prompts was associated with improved recording of four of seven variables on diabetes and all six variables on asthma.

conclusionsLocal guidelines disseminated via practice based education improve the management of diabetes and possibly of asthma in inner city, non-training practices. The use of simple prompts may enhance this improvement.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicQuality of Health CareAdultAsthmaDiabetes MellitusEducation, MedicalFamily PracticeFemaleHumansLondonMaleMedical AuditMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationRegistries

Identifiers

PMID8520339
PMCPMC2543702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.