ReviewThe Clinical investigator1993
Ovarian sex steroids and atherosclerosis.
Review in The Clinical investigator, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gender Differences in Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: From Lipids to Clinical Outcomes.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Reproductive factors and lower extremity arterial occlusive disease in women.European journal of epidemiology · 2007Article
- Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy, coronary heart disease and plasma lipoproteins.Drugs · 1994Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estrogens have been found to protect against atherosclerosis in a variety of animal models, and these antiatherogenic properties have been confirmed by epidemiological and clinical studies in women as well. Since the estrogen-induced changes of plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels do not fully account for the prevention of atherosclerosis, additional effects must be assumed. Experimental studies suggest various direct vascular actions. Estrogens enhance the endothelial degradation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and preliminary data indicate antioxidative actions on low-density lipoprotein particles in macrophages. They suppress intimal proliferation and extracellular matrix production in the arterial wall and induce marked vasodilatation in systemic and coronary arteries. Adverse effects on hemostatic factors described with high doses and synthetic compounds are not evident during hormonal replacement in postmenopausal women, in whom an estradiol-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation may even have beneficial clinical effects. The role of progesterone and other progestogens in the progression of atherosclerosis is controversial. Despite a partial antagonism to estrogen-induced changes of plasma lipids, their addition to estrogens does not alter the anti-atherosclerotic properties, at least in animal experiments. The direct vascular actions of progestogens-although not as well documented-seem to be less pronounced than those of estrogens. The experimental data indicate that direct vascular effects play an important role in the antiatherogenic properties of ovarian sex steroids. However, the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms remain largely unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.