Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8498616›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health1993

The conflict between public health goals and the temperance mentality.

S Peele

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Psychopathology and mortality in the general population.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 1995
    Article
  3. Correlates of college student binge drinking.American journal of public health · 1995
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Alcohol, the heart, and health.American journal of public health · 1993
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

S Peele

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe prevailing view today is that alcohol consumption is unambiguously a social and public health problem. This paper presents evidence to balance this view.

methodsEvidence of beneficial effects of alcohol against coronary artery disease is examined, together with cultural reasons for resistance in the United States to the implications of this evidence.

resultsAlcohol use reduces the risk of coronary artery disease--the major cause of heart disease, America's leading killer--even for those at risk for such disease. Moreover, recent research indicates that alcohol continues to reduce risk at the higher levels of drinking measured in general populations. However, with consumption of more than two drinks daily, these gains are increasingly offset by greater mortality from other causes.

conclusionsEducators, public health commentators, and medical investigators are uneasy about findings of healthful effects of drinking. A cultural preoccupation with alcoholism and the negative effects of drinking works against frank scientific discussions in the United States of the advantages for the cardiovascular system of alcohol consumption. This set has deep roots in American history but is inconsistent with public health goals.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingPublic HealthTemperanceCoronary DiseaseHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID8498616
PMCPMC1694753
OpenAlexW2169069933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.