ArticleImmunology1993
T-cell lymphokine response to orally administered proteins during priming and unresponsiveness.
Article in Immunology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Induction of mucosal tolerance in SLE: a sniff or a sip away from ameliorating lupus?Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) · 2009Review
- T-cell responses to orally administered antigens. Study of the kinetics of lymphokine production after single and multiple feeding.Immunology · 1995Article
- Rabies ribonucleocapsid as an oral immunogen and immunological enhancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1994Article
- Inhibition of T-cell responses by feeding peptides containing major and cryptic epitopes: studies with the Der p I allergen.Immunology · 1994Article
- Suppression of hen egg lysozyme-induced arthritis by intravenous antigen administration: no role in this for antigen-driven bystander suppression.Clinical and experimental immunology · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Feeding antigens induces an immunological unresponsiveness termed oral tolerance but under some conditions, for example following the administration of cyclophosphamide (CY), immunity can be induced. These observations have usually been made by studying antibody production and delayed hypersensitivity with little attention given to other measurements of cellular activation. We have therefore examined the lymphokines produced by T cells obtained after the induction of oral tolerance or intragastric priming. Cells isolated from the spleen and Peyer's patches (PP) of tolerized mice could secrete high levels of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and moderate levels of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in response to antigen while interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-3 and IL-4 could not be detected. Mesenteric lymph node (MLN) cells of tolerized mice did not respond to antigen unless spleen adherent cells were added to the cultures where IFN-gamma and GM-CSF were produced. Intragastric priming was achieved by feeding antigen to CY-treated mice. T cells from the spleen, MLN and PP of these mice could produce GM-CSF, IFN-gamma, some IL-3 but little or no IL-2 and IL-4. The ability of MLN cells to proliferate with antigen in vitro was low and corresponded to low IL-2 production. Thus T cells from fed mice secrete a defined pattern of lymphokines which differs in tolerizing and priming regimes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8495970PMC1421882W2412993146What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.