ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology1993
Comparison of treadmill exercise testing protocols for wheelchair users.
Article in European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reliability and Validity of Laboratory and Field Cardiorespiratory Exercise Tests for Wheelchair Users: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of Aerobic Performance Testing Protocols in Elite Male Wheelchair Basketball Players.Journal of human kinetics · 2017Article
- Perspective: Does Laboratory-Based Maximal Incremental Exercise Testing Elicit Maximum Physiological Responses in Highly-Trained Athletes with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury?Frontiers in physiology · 2015Article
- Echographic and kinetic changes in the shoulder joint after manual wheelchair propulsion under two different workload settings.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2014Article
- Field-based physiological testing of wheelchair athletes.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2013Review
- Physiology of wheelchair racing in athletes with spinal cord injury.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2002Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reduced early mortality and the increased life span of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) and other chronically disabling conditions which result in loss of use of the legs places them at increased risk of coronary heart disease, diabetes, and hypertension. Exercise testing in this population is becoming more common, but there is a need for assessment of protocols in order to determine the best method to elicit a maximal response in a reasonable time without endangering the patient. Three wheelchair treadmill protocols were compared in seven men with paraplegia aged 21-44 years (five SCI, two post-polio). Subjects repeated each protocol to estimate reliability. Protocol G consisted of increasing treadmill grade at a constant speed (4.8 km.h-1); in protocol S, the speed was increased at a constant grade (0%), and in protocol C, speed and grade were increased. Two-minute stages were used in all protocols. Peak oxygen uptake [VO2max; mean (SD): 23.6 (5.8) ml.kg-1 x min-1; 1.66 (0.37) l.min-1], VCO2 production [1.98 (0.46) l.min-1], ventilation volume [83.0 (25.6) l.min-1], respiratory exchange ratio [1.2 (0.12)], and heart rate [173 (18)] were determined. Over all trials none of the variables was significantly different among the three protocols, but all were highest in C and lowest in S. Reliability coefficients for absolute and relative VO2max ranged from 0.76 and 0.81 in G to 0.95 and 0.98 in C (all P < 0.05). These data suggest that an incremental treadmill test similar to the C protocol may be the optimal method to use when evaluating the exercise capacity of wheelchair users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8495700What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.