Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8494986›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1993

New physical concepts for cell amoeboid motion.

E Evans

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mathematics of cell motility: have we got its number?Journal of mathematical biology · 2009
    Review
  3. Spatio-temporal analysis of eukaryotic cell motility by improved force cytometry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Simultaneous mapping of filamentous actin flow and turnover in migrating cells by quantitative fluorescent speckle microscopy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2004
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Traction forces generated by locomoting keratocytes.The Journal of cell biology · 1994
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

E EvansDepartment of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

RHEOLOGICAL AND ADHERENCE PROPERTIES OF SICKLE CELLSR01HL031579 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI NARLA, MOHANDAS · 1985 to 2010
$3.8M
BLOOD CELL MECHANICS, SURFACE AFFINITY AND ADHESIONR01HL045099 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI EVANS, EVAN A · 1990 to 1992
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-31579NHLBI NIH HHS HL-45099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amoeboid motion of cells is an essential mechanism in the function of many biological organisms (e.g., the regiment of scavenger cells in the immune defense system of animals). This process involves rapid chemical polymerization (with numerous protein constituents) to create a musclelike contractile network that advances the cell over the surface. Significant progress has been made in the biology and biochemistry of motile cells, but the physical dynamics of cell spreading and contraction are not well understood. The reason is that general approaches are formulated from complex mass, momentum, and chemical reaction equations for multiphase-multicomponent flow with the nontrivial difficulty of moving boundaries. However, there are strong clues to the dynamics that allow bold steps to be taken in simplifying the physics of motion. First, amoeboid cells often exhibit exceptional kinematics, i.e., steady advance and retraction of local fixed-shape patterns. Second, recent evidence has shown that cell projections "grow" by polymerization along the advancing boundary of the cell. Together, these characteristics represent a local growth process pinned to the interfacial contour of a contractile network. As such, the moving boundary becomes tractable, but subtle features of the motion lead to specific requirements for the chemical nature of the boundary polymerization process. To demonstrate these features, simple examples for limiting conditions of substrate interaction (i.e., "strong" and "weak" adhesion) are compared with data from experimental studies of yeast particle engulfment by blood granulocytes and actin network dynamics in fishscale keratocytes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsCell AdhesionCell MembraneCell MovementCytosolDiffusionHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMathematicsModels, BiologicalPolymersRheologyStress, MechanicalPolymers

Identifiers

PMID8494986
PMCPMC1262449
OpenAlexW2036415690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.