Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8491731›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology1993

Volume growth of daughter and parent cells during the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae a/alpha as determined by image cytometry.

C L Woldringh, P G Huls, N O Vischer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Branching process deconvolution algorithm reveals a detailed cell-cycle transcription program.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Growth and division--not a one-way road.Current opinion in cell biology · 2010
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C L WoldringhDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P G Huls
N O Vischer
University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pattern of volume growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae a/alpha was determined by image cytometry for daughter cells and consecutive cycles of parent cells. An image analysis program was specially developed to measure separately the volume of bud and mother cell parts and to quantify the number of bud scars on each parent cell. All volumetric data and cell attributes (budding state, number of scars) were stored in such a way that separate volume distributions of cells or cell parts with any combination of properties--for instance, buds present on mothers with two scars or cells without scars (i.e., daughter cells) and without buds--could be obtained. By a new method called intersection analysis, the average volumes of daughter and parent cells at birth and at division could be determined for a steady-state population. These volumes compared well with those directly measured from cells synchronized by centrifugal elutriation. During synchronous growth of daughter cells, the pattern of volume increase appeared to be largely exponential. However, after bud emergence, larger volumes than those predicted by a continuous exponential increase were obtained, which confirms the reported decrease in buoyant density. The cycle times calculated from the steady-state population by applying the age distribution equation deviated from those directly obtained from the synchronized culture, probably because of inadequate scoring of bud scars. Therefore, for the construction of a volume-time diagram, we used volume measurements obtained from the steady-state population and cycle times obtained from the synchronized population. The diagram shows that after bud emergence, mother cell parts continue to grow at a smaller rate, increasing about 10% in volume during the budding period. Second-generation daughter cells, ie., cells born from parents left with two scars, were significantly smaller than first-generation daughter cells. Second- and third-generation parent cells showed a decreased volume growth rate and a shorter budding period than that of daughter cells.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCell SizeImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSaccharomyces cerevisiaeStatistics as TopicTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID8491731
PMCPMC204640
OpenAlexW1484711471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.