ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics1993
Cephalosporin-probenecid drug interactions.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cefepime-enmetazobactam for complicated urinary tract infections: Redefining ESBL therapy.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Review
- The Issue of Pharmacokinetic-Driven Drug-Drug Interactions of Antibiotics: A Narrative Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Ceftriaxone Used Alone and Combined with Danhong Injection in Old Rats.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2019Article
- Update on management of skin and soft tissue infections in the emergency department.Current infectious disease reports · 2014Article
- Reduced renal clearance of cefotaxime in asians with a low-frequency polymorphism of OAT3 (SLC22A8).Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2013Article
- Effects of renal function on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prophylactic cefazolin in cardiothoracic surgery.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012Article
- Assessment of the role of renal organic anion transporters in drug-induced nephrotoxicity.Toxins · 2010Review
- Pharmacokinetic significance of renal OAT3 (SLC22A8) for anionic drug elimination in patients with mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis.Pharmaceutical research · 2005Article
- Effects of organic anion, organic cation, and dipeptide transport inhibitors on cefdinir in the isolated perfused rat kidney.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2003Article
- Pharmacokinetic aspects of treating infections in the intensive care unit: focus on drug interactions.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2001Review
- Drug interactions at the renal level. Implications for drug development.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 1998Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effect of concurrent probenecid administration on the pharmacokinetics of cephalosporin antibiotics varies with the available cephalosporins. Most cephalosporins are affected to some degree by concurrent probenecid administration, although ceforanide, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone and latamoxef (moxalactam) have no significant changes in pharmacokinetics. For those cephalosporins affected by probenecid, the predominant findings are impairment in renal clearance resulting in increased peak serum concentrations, an increased area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and both delayed and prolonged recovery of the cephalosporin in the urine. The distribution of the cephalosporins is affected to varying degrees, with reports of increased penetration into ocular, central nervous system and blister fluids noted with some agents. The clinical relevance of the changes in cephalosporin distribution associated with probenecid administration has not been investigated. The dose and timing of probenecid administration appear to be major determinants in any possible interaction. Studies with ceftizoxime and cefoxitin suggest that larger probenecid doses result in greater changes in the pharmacokinetics of cephalosporins. Prolonged probenecid therapy before administration of a cephalosporin did not seem to be as relevant as the probenecid dosage in determining the magnitude of the interaction. Probenecid administration with or immediately before cephalosporin administration appears able to produce these documented changes in cephalosporin pharmacokinetics. The route of administration (oral versus parenteral) of either prolosporin pharmacokinetics. The route of administration (oral versus parenteral) of either probenecid or the cephalosporin does not appear to influence the characteristics of the interactions. The therapeutic efficacy of a combination of a cephalosporin with probenecid has been most thoroughly studied for single-dose treatment of gonorrhoea. The addition of probenecid to cephalosporin therapy results in sustained systemic concentrations adequate for eradication of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Regimens involving either second or third generation cephalosporins demonstrate good success rates with single-dose therapy. However, the success of ceftriaxone administered alone for treatment of both penicillase-producing and non-penicillase-producing strains of N. gonorrhoeae suggests that the addition of probenecid is unnecessary. The use of probenecid, in combination with cephalosporins, to enhance the treatment of other venereal and systemic infections has preliminary, inconclusive support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.