ArticleChromosoma1993
Detection of minimal amounts of DNA by electron microscopy using simplified spreading procedures.
Article in Chromosoma, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-linking of DNA through HMGA1 suggests a DNA scaffold.Nucleic acids research · 2011Article
- Changes in chromosomal ultrastructure during the cell cycle.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 1996Article
- Localization of hepatitis B virus core protein and viral DNA at the nuclear membrane.Virus genes · 1996Article
- Diheteroduplex formation using gold labeled single-stranded PCR fragments and its application in electron microscopy.Chromosoma · 1995Article
- Hepatitis B virus genome is organized into nucleosomes in the nucleus of the infected cell.Virus genes · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electron microscopic examination of nucleic acids requires the use of special spreading techniques. The classical method was developed by Kleinschmidt and Zahn in 1959. Modifications of this method increased sensitivity to allow detection of a total amount of about 1 x 10(-3) micrograms of single-stranded DNA and 2 x 10(-5) micrograms of double-stranded DNA. Here we describe two rapid and simple procedures increasing sensitivity by 1-2 orders of magnitude to visualize at least 1 x 10(-5) micrograms of single- and/or double-stranded DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8486076What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.