ArticleNucleic acids research1993
Activity of U-snRNA genes with modified placement of promoter elements in transfected protoplasts and stably transformed tobacco.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Small Nucleolar Derived RNAs as Regulators of Human Cancer.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Artificial microRNA-mediated virus resistance in plants.Journal of virology · 2007Article
- Molecular analysis of the gene family of the signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA of tomato.Plant molecular biology · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In higher plants the promoter elements of pol II- and pol III-transcribed U-snRNA genes are identical, comprising a -30 TATA box and an upstream sequence element, USE. The USE and TATA are centred approximately four and three helical DNA turns apart in pol II and pol III genes, respectively, and it is this difference in the element spacing that determines the RNA polymerase specificity of the gene. In this study we have analyzed the effect of spacing mutations on activity of Arabidopsis U2 and U6 genes in transfected protoplasts of Nicotiana plumbaginifolia and in stably transformed tobacco. In the pol III-transcribed U6 gene the insertions and deletions of either odd or even numbers of half helical turns completely inactivate transcription in transfected protoplasts, consistent with the high conservation of the element spacing found in all plant U-snRNA genes. Surprisingly, while insertions of 50 base pairs (bp) or more into the spacer of the pol II-specific U2 gene inactivate transcription, a deletion of 5 bp or insertions of as much as 20 bp decrease transcription by only 40 to 70%. This relaxed requirement for the conserved element spacing is only seen in transfected protoplasts since the same mutant U2 genes are not transcribed in stably transformed tobacco when transcription takes place from the chromosome. The results provide some clues about possible factor interactions at the promoters of plant U-snRNA genes and also offer an example of major differences in transcription between transiently and stably transformed cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.