Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8474446›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1993

Mechanism of c-myc regulation by c-Myb in different cell lineages.

J P Cogswell, P C Cogswell, W M Kuehl, A M Cuddihy, T M Bender, U Engelke, K B Marcu, J P Ting

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J P CogswellLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7295.
P C Cogswell
W M Kuehl
A M Cuddihy
T M Bender
U Engelke
K B Marcu
J P Ting
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Molecular and Functional Analysis of NLR Family MembersR01AI029564 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Jenny P Ting · 1991 to 2026
$6.0M
Plexin-A1: Regulation by CIITA and Immunologic FunctionR37AI029564 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TING, JENNY P · 2008 to 2017
$3.8M
Plexin-A1: Regulation by CIITA and immunologic functionR56AI029564 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TING, JENNY P.Y. · 2007 to 2007
$363k
CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATED ONCOGENES AND NEOPLASIAR01CA036246 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI MARCU, KENNETH B · 1985 to 1993
–
MOLECULAR CONTROL OF HLA-DR GENES IN T AND B LYMPHOCYTESR01CA048185 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TING, JENNY P.Y. · 1988 to 1996
–
NCI NIH HHS CA36246NCI NIH HHS R01-CA48185NIAID NIH HHS AI29564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activation of the murine c-myc promoter by murine c-Myb protein was examined in several cell lines by using a transient expression system in which Myb expression vectors activate the c-myc promoter linked to a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene or a genomic beta-globin gene. S1 nuclease protection analyses confirmed that the induction of c-myc by c-Myb was transcriptional and affected both P1 and P2 start sites in a murine T-cell line, EL4, and a myelomonocytic line, WEHI-3. Mutational analyses of the c-myc promoter revealed that two distinct regions could confer Myb responsiveness in two T-cell lines, a distal site upstream of P1 and a proximal site within the first noncoding exon. In contrast, only the proximal site was required for other cell lineages examined. Five separate Myb-binding sites were located in this proximal site and found to be important for c-Myb trans activation. DNA binding was necessary for c-myc activation, as shown by the loss of function associated with mutation of Myb's DNA-binding domain and by trans-dominant repressor activity of the DNA binding, trans-activation-defective mutant. The involvement of additional protein factors was addressed by inhibiting protein synthesis with cycloheximide in a conditional expression system in which the activity of presynthesized Myb was under the control of estrogen. These experiments indicate that de novo synthesis of additional proteins was not necessary for c-myc trans activation. Together these data reveal two cell lineage-dependent pathways by which c-Myb regulates c-myc; however, both pathways are mechanistically indistinguishable in that direct DNA binding by Myb is required for activating c-myc whereas neither de novo protein synthesis nor other labile proteins are necessary.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, mycOncogenesPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription, GeneticAnimalsBase SequenceBinding SitesChloramphenicol O-AcetyltransferaseExonsGlobinsL CellsLeukemia, ExperimentalLymphoma, T-CellMiceChloramphenicol O-AcetyltransferaseGlobinsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-myb

Identifiers

PMID8474446
PMCPMC359676
OpenAlexW2139855660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.