Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8473485›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation1993

Induction patterns of 70 genes during nine days after hepatectomy define the temporal course of liver regeneration.

B A Haber, K L Mohn, R H Diamond, R Taub

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 204 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Liver regeneration.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. G1 cell cycle arrest signaling in hepatic injury after intraperitoneal sepsis in rats.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
  20. ATF3-mediated epigenetic regulation protects against acute kidney injury.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B A HaberDepartment of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, Philadelphia 19104-6145.
K L Mohn
R H Diamond
R Taub
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

FUNCTION OF A GROWTH INDUCED GENE IN LIVER REGENERATIONR01DK044237 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KAESTNER, KLAUS H. · 1991 to 2003
$1.1M
BIOGENESIS OF CANALICULAR MEMBRANE GLYCOPROTEINSK11DK001905 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HABER, BARBARA ANNE · 1989 to 1993
–
NIDDK NIH HHS K11 DK-01905NIDDK NIH HHS K11 DK-O2O96NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK-44237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver regeneration is an important process that allows for recovery from hepatic injuries caused by viruses, toxins, ischemia, surgery, and transplantation. Previously, we identified > 70 immediate-early genes induced in regenerating liver after hepatectomy, 41 of which were novel. While it is expected that the proteins encoded by these genes may have important roles in regulating progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle during regeneration, we were surprised to note that many of these "early" genes are expressed for extended periods during the hepatic growth response. Here we define several patterns of expression of immediate-early, delayed-early, and liver-specific genes during the 9-d period after hepatectomy. One pattern of induction parallels the major growth period of the liver that ends at 60-72 h after hepatectomy. A second pattern has two peaks coincident with the first and second G1 phases of the two hepatic cell cycles. A third group, which includes liver-specific genes such as C/EBP alpha, shows maximal expression after the growth period. Although the peak in DNA synthesis in nonparenchymal cells occur 24 h later than in hepatocytes, most of the genes studied demonstrate similar induction in both cell types. This finding suggests that the G0/G1 transition occurs simultaneously in all cells in the liver, but that the G1 phase of nonparenchymal cells may be relatively prolonged. Finally, we examined the expression of > 70 genes in clinical settings that could induce liver regeneration, including after perfusion in a donor liver, hepatic ischemia, and fulminant hepatic failure. We found that a small number of early and liver-specific genes were selectively activated in human livers under these conditions, and we thereby provide a potential means of measuring the caliber of the regenerative response in clinical situations.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsBlotting, NorthernCell SeparationFemaleGene Expression RegulationHepatectomyHumansKupffer CellsLiverLiver RegenerationRatsRats, Inbred F344Time Factors

Identifiers

PMID8473485
PMCPMC288102
OpenAlexW2082253209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.