ArticleThe EMBO journal1993
Influence of the v-Myb transactivation domain on the oncoprotein's transformation specificity.
Article in The EMBO journal, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Essential meiotic structure-specific endonuclease1 (Bioengineered · 2021Article
- Identification and characterization of the Myb-inducible promoter of the chicken adenosine receptor 2B gene.Oncogene · 2002Article
- The chicken Pdcd4 gene is regulated by v-Myb.Oncogene · 2001Article
- c-Maf interacts with c-Myb to regulate transcription of an early myeloid gene during differentiation.Molecular and cellular biology · 1998Article
- A role for CREB binding protein and p300 transcriptional coactivators in Ets-1 transactivation functions.Molecular and cellular biology · 1998Article
- Regulatory domains of the A-Myb transcription factor and its interaction with the CBP/p300 adaptor molecules.The Biochemical journal · 1997Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The v-myb-containing viruses AMV and E26 induce the proliferation of myelomonocytic cells. The E26 Myb protein, by virtue of its fusion to Ets, is also able to transform multipotent haematopoietic cells (MEPs). We have examined the biological effects of substituting the v-Myb transactivation domain with the strong acidic activator domain from the C-terminus of the HSV-1 VP16 protein. In the absence of Ets, deletion of the transactivation domain destroyed the ability of v-Myb to stimulate transcription and to transform cells, whilst the substitution of the VP16 transactivation domain into v-Myb resulted in a greatly enhanced transactivation potential and altered TATA box binding protein (TBP) binding properties. In spite of these functional differences, the v-Myb VP16 protein regained the ability to transform myeloid cells with the same characteristics as wild type v-Myb. A construct encoding v-Myb VP16 fused to v-Ets was still capable of inducing leukaemia and of transforming both myeloid cells and MEPs in vitro, although the latter cells exhibited an altered phenotype. Our results demonstrate that the transformation of myeloid cells by v-Myb is largely independent of the type and potency of the transactivation domain it contains, whereas transformation of MEPs by the Myb-Ets fusion protein has more stringent transactivation requirements of Myb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.