ArticleThe Clinical investigator1993
Cefotaxime desensitization.
Article in The Clinical investigator, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Desensitization for the prevention of drug hypersensitivity reactions.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2022Review
- Antimicrobial Desensitization: A Review of Published Protocols.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Desensitization for Allergic Reactions to Chemotherapy.Yonsei medical journal · 2019Review
- Clinical applications of drug desensitization in the Asia-Pacific region.Asia Pacific allergy · 2011Article
- A guide to antibiotics for the interventional radiologist.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the successful desensitization to cefotaxime in a patient with severe lumbar osteomyelitis of unknown bacteriology and hypersensitivity to the drug. Desensitization was carried out because of the unknown bacteriology, the favorable response to cefotaxime at that time, and hypersensitivity to other antibiotics. On the first day the patient received 1 mg cefotaxime intravenously. The dose was increased for 13 successive days to 4 g cefotaxime intravenously per day. No allergic reaction occurred during desensitization or within 4 weeks of observation under this therapy. Patients with severe infections of unknown bacteriology might benefit from desensitization if therapy with a second-choice antibiotic is impossible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.