ArticleBiophysical journal1993
Solution structure and dynamics of cyclic and acyclic cholinergic agonists.
Article in Biophysical journal, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computer simulations of cyclic and acyclic cholinergic agonists: conformational search and molecular dynamics simulations.Biophysical journal · 1994Article
- Analysis of cyclic and acyclic nicotinic cholinergic agonists using radioligand binding, single channel recording, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.Biophysical journal · 1993Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Two classes of nicotinic cholinergic agonists, which vary in flexibility and electronegativity, have been synthesized, and their structural and dynamic properties have been studied with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Although the compounds are chemically identical except for the presence or absence of one cyclicizing C--C bond, single channel recording and radioligand binding studies have shown that the cyclic compounds are considerably more potent than the acyclic derivatives (McGroddy, K.A., A.A. Carter, M.M. Tubbert, and R.E. Oswald. 1993. Biophys. J. 64:325-338). Using one- and two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy, we have shown that these molecules exist in two distinct stable conformers, which differ in the orientation of the amide bond. The cyclic 1,1-dimethyl-4-trifluoroacetyl-piperazinium iodide and its trifluoromethyl derivative compounds are symmetric, and the two conformers are of equal energy. The acyclic N,N,N,N'-tetramethyl-N'-acetylethylene-diamine iodide (TED) and its trifluoromethyl derivative derivatives, however, populate two energetically unequal solution conformations. Using variable temperature NMR spectroscopy on these molecules and their uncharged precursors, we have characterized the energetics of amide bond isomerization and have distinguished steric and electrostatic contributions to the equilibrium between the two conformers. The more populated TED conformer has the amide methyl group trans to the carbonyl oxygen, and it is stabilized by an electrostatic attraction between the partially negative carbonyl oxygen and the positively charged quaternary amine nitrogen. As discussed in the accompanying paper (McGroddy, K.A., A.A. Carter, M.M. Tubbert, and R.E. Oswald. 1993. Biophys. J. 64:325-338), the differences in the stable solution structures of the TED derivatives and their interconversion kinetics may be of biological significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.