ArticleHeart and vessels1993
Lacidipine, a new long-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, has high vascular selectivity against all intracardiac variables.
Article in Heart and vessels, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Interactions of a new beta-blocker, celiprolol, with the calcium antagonists, diltiazem and nifedipine, on atrioventricular conduction.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 1995Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vascular selectivity of lacidipine, a new potent and long-acting coronary vasodilator, was evaluated by a comparison with its negative inotropic, chronotropic, and dromotropic effects in canine isolated, blood-perfused heart preparations. The drug was injected into each nutrient artery in a bolus fashion. In the papillary muscle preparation, the dose causing a 50% increase in blood flow through the anterior septal artery was 0.23 micrograms (mean of five experiments) and the time required for return to half maximum at this dose was 15.0 min even with a bolus injection. Meanwhile, the dose causing a 50% decrease in developed tension of the papillary muscle was 4.6 micrograms. The dose producing a 15% decrease in sinoatrial rate in the sinoatrial node preparation was 8.4 micrograms (n = 5) and that causing a 50% increase in atrio-His interval in the atrioventricular node preparation was 6.8 micrograms (n = 7). These results indicate that the vascular selectivity of lacidipine is markedly high not only against ventricular contractility but also against sinoatrial node automaticity and atrioventricular nodal conduction. The high lipophilicity of lacidipine might be related, at least in part, to its high vascular selectivity, which was equieffective against all the intracardiac variables measured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8454559W2060347433What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.