Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8454200›Full record

ArticleGenetics1993

Replication-dependent sister chromatid recombination in rad1 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

L C Kadyk, L H Hartwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. BothAIMS genetics · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

L C KadykDepartment of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
L H Hartwell

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICS GENERAL AND MEDICALT32GM007735 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI THOMAS, JAMES H · 1985 to 2009
$3.8M
GENETIC ANALYSIS OF THE EUKARYOTIC CELL CYCLER01GM017709 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HARTWELL, LELAND H · 1985 to 2005
$2.3M
GENETIC ANALYSIS OF THE EUKARYOTIC CELL CYCLER37GM017709 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HARTWELL, LELAND H · 1990 to 2000
$534k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 07735NIGMS NIH HHS GM 17709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homolog recombination and unequal sister chromatid recombination were monitored in rad1-1/rad1-1 diploid yeast cells deficient for excision repair, and in control cells, RAD1/rad1-1, after exposure to UV irradiation. In a rad1-1/rad1-1 diploid, UV irradiation stimulated much more sister chromatid recombination relative to homolog recombination when cells were irradiated in the G1 or the G2 phases of the cell cycle than was observed in RAD1/rad1-1 cells. Since sister chromatids are not present during G1, this result suggested that unexcised lesions can stimulate sister chromatid recombination events during or subsequent to DNA replication. The results of mating rescue experiments suggest that unexcised UV dimers do not stimulate sister chromatid recombination during the G2 phase, but only when they are present during DNA replication. We propose that there are two types of sister chromatid recombination in yeast. In the first type, unexcised UV dimers and other bulky lesions induce sister chromatid recombination during DNA replication as a mechanism to bypass lesions obstructing the passage of DNA polymerase, and this type is analogous to the type of sister chromatid exchange commonly observed cytologically in mammalian cells. In the second type, strand scissions created by X-irradiation or the excision of damaged bases create recombinogenic sites that result in sister chromatid recombination directly in G2. Further support for the existence of two types of sister chromatid recombination is the fact that events induced in rad1-1/rad1-1 were due almost entirely to gene conversion, whereas those in RAD1/rad1-1 cells were due to a mixture of gene conversion and reciprocal recombination.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticCell CycleDiploidyDNA RepairDNA ReplicationGene ConversionGenes, FungalModels, GeneticMutationPlasmidsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSister Chromatid ExchangeUltraviolet Rays

Identifiers

PMID8454200
PMCPMC1205336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.