ArticleHuman genetics1993
Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization.
Article in Human genetics, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
101 citing papers in PubMed, 557 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) in Genotoxicology: From the Basics to Modern Approaches.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Review
- The reckoning of chromosomal instability: past, present, future.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2024Review
- Molecular Cytogenetics in Domestic Bovids: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Advances in novel strategies for isolation, characterization, and analysis of CTCs and ctDNA.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023Review
- The Impact of Next-Generation Sequencing on Cancer Genomics: From Discovery to Clinic.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2019Review
- Genetic alterations driving metastatic colony formation are acquired outside of the primary tumour in melanoma.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Loss of chromosome Y leads to down regulation of KDM5D and KDM6C epigenetic modifiers in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- CNARA: reliability assessment for genomic copy number profiles.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- SNP Array in Hematopoietic Neoplasms: A Review.Microarrays (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Review
- Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of invasive ductal breast carcinomas in the Chinese population.Oncology letters · 2015Article
- Molecular cytogenetic analysis of telomere rearrangements.Current protocols in human genetics · 2015Article
- The telomere profile distinguishes two classes of genetically distinct cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas.Oncogene · 2014Article
- Recollections of a scientific journey published in human genetics: from chromosome territories to interphase cytogenetics and comparative genome hybridization.Human genetics · 2014Article
- Progenetix: 12 years of oncogenomic data curation.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- DNA sequencing methods in human genetics and disease research.F1000prime reports · 2013Review
- The consequences of chromosomal aneuploidy on the transcriptome of cancer cells.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2012Review
- Analysis of cytogenetic aberrations in sporadic vestibular schwannoma by comparative genomic hybridization.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2011Article
- Virtual CGH: an integrative approach to predict genetic abnormalities from gene expression microarray data applied in lymphoma.BMC medical genomics · 2011Article
- Genome and transcriptome profiles of CD133-positive colorectal cancer cells.The American journal of pathology · 2011Article
41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comparative genomic in situ hybridization (CGH) provides a new possibility for searching genomes for imbalanced genetic material. Labeled genomic test DNA, prepared from clinical or tumor specimens, is mixed with differently labeled control DNA prepared from cells with normal chromosome complements. The mixed probe is used for chromosomal in situ suppression (CISS) hybridization to normal metaphase spreads (CGH-metaphase spreads). Hybridized test and control DNA sequences are detected via different fluorochromes, e.g., fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and tetraethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC). The ratios of FITC/TRITC fluorescence intensities for each chromosome or chromosome segment should then reflect its relative copy number in the test genome compared with the control genome, e.g., 0.5 for monosomies, 1 for disomies, 1.5 for trisomies, etc. Initially, model experiments were designed to test the accuracy of fluorescence ratio measurements on single chromosomes. DNAs from up to five human chromosome-specific plasmid libraries were labeled with biotin and digoxigenin in different hapten proportions. Probe mixtures were used for CISS hybridization to normal human metaphase spreads and detected with FITC and TRITC. An epifluorescence microscope equipped with a cooled charge coupled device (CCD) camera was used for image acquisition. Procedures for fluorescence ratio measurements were developed on the basis of commercial image analysis software. For hapten ratios 4/1, 1/1 and 1/4, fluorescence ratio values measured for individual chromosomes could be used as a single reliable parameter for chromosome identification. Our findings indicate (1) a tight correlation of fluorescence ratio values with hapten ratios, and (2) the potential of fluorescence ratio measurements for multiple color chromosome painting. Subsequently, genomic test DNAs, prepared from a patient with Down syndrome, from blood of a patient with T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia, and from cultured cells of a renal papillary carcinoma cell line, were applied in CGH experiments. As expected, significant differences in the fluorescence ratios could be measured for chromosome types present in different copy numbers in these test genomes, including a trisomy of chromosome 21, the smallest autosome of the human complement. In addition, chromosome material involved in partial gains and losses of the different tumors could be mapped to their normal chromosome counterparts in CGH-metaphase spreads. An alternative and simpler evaluation procedure based on visual inspection of CCD images of CGH-metaphase spreads also yielded consistent results from several independent observers. Pitfalls, methodological improvements, and potential applications of CGH analyses are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.