Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8437884›Full record

ArticlePflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology1993

Mechanical modulation of a voltage-dependent non-inactivating K+ current in cultured bullfrog sympathetic neurones.

S Hara, K Kuba

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S HaraDepartment of Physiology, Saga Medical School, Japan.
K Kuba

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultured bullfrog sympathetic ganglion cells were voltage-clamped with a whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Local flow of a solution (identical to the bathing solution) from a micropipette to a cell, but not other mechanical stimuli, produced a non-inactivating outward (in 34 cells out of 141) or inward (in 70 cells) current [I(f)(out) or I(f)(in), respectively] depending on cells. Both I(f)(out) and I(f)(in) appeared at voltages more positive than -60 mV. The mechanism, however, was activated even at -70 mV, as I(f)(out) or I(f)(in) appeared on shifting membrane potential to -30 mV immediately after the local flow. I(f)(out) and I(f)(in) were accompanied by increases and decreases, respectively, in the membrane conductance and current relaxation to a voltage jump between -30 mV and -55 mV without a change in its time constant (whose value was similar to that of a voltage-dependent non-inactivating K+ current, IM), and reversed at a membrane potential close to the equilibrium potential for K+. Both I(f)(out) and I(f)(in) were blocked by Ba2+ (4-8 mM), a blocker of IM, and by muscarine (10 microM), which produced either an "apparent inward" or outward current. A transient outward current activated by a voltage jump from -85 mV (or -75 mV) to -30 mV was little affected by a local flow of a solution which produced I(f)(out) or I(f)(in). These results suggest that the local solution flow produced I(f)(in) or I(f)(out) by deactivating or activating IM, respectively.

Indexed as

AnimalsBariumGanglia, SympatheticIon TransportMembrane PotentialsMuscarineNeuronsPhysical StimulationPotassiumRana catesbeianaBariumMuscarinePotassium

Identifiers

PMID8437884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.