Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8416987›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology1993

Determinants of the translational mobility of a small solute in cell cytoplasm.

H P Kao, J R Abney, A S Verkman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 298 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of Daughter Radionuclide Release from thePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Thermodynamics of Medial Vascular Calcification.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H P KaoDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0532.
J R Abney
A S Verkman
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

MECHANISMS OF WATER TRANSPORT IN RENAL EPITHELIAR37DK035124 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VERKMAN, ALAN S · 1999 to 2008
$4.2M
WATER AND NON-ELECTROLYTE TRANSPORT IN RENAL VESICLESR01DK035124 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VERKMAN, ALAN S · 1986 to 2014
$1.4M
APPLICATION OF NOVEL OPTICAL METHODS TO CELL DYNAMICSR01DK043840 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI VERKMAN, ALAN S · 1993 to 2001
$494k
SINGLE CHANNEL KINETICS OF WILD-TYPE AND MUTANT CFTRP50HL042368 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI FINKBEINER, WALTER E · 1988 to 1997
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL42368NIDDK NIH HHS DK35124NIDDK NIH HHS DK43840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purposes of this study were: (a) to measure the translational mobility of a small solute in cell cytoplasm; (b) to define quantitatively the factors that determine solute translation; and (c) to compare and contrast solute rotation and translation. A small fluorescent probe, 2,7-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and 6-)-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF), was introduced into the cytoplasm of Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts. BCECF translation was measured by fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching; rotation was measured by Fourier transform polarization microscopy. Diffusion coefficients relative to those in water (D/D0) were determined by comparing mobility in cytoplasm with mobility in standard solutions of known viscosity. At isosmotic cell volume, the relative diffusion coefficients for BCECF translation and rotation in cytoplasm were 0.27 +/- 0.01 (SEM, n = 24, 23 degrees C) and 0.78 +/- 0.03 (n = 4), respectively. As cell volume increased from 0.33 to 2 times isosmotic volume, the relative translational diffusion coefficient increased from 0.047 to 0.32, while the relative rotational diffusion coefficient remained constant. The factors determining BCECF translation were evaluated by comparing rotation and translation in cytoplasm, and in artificial solutions containing dextrans (mobile barriers) and agarose gels (immobile barriers). It was concluded that the hindrance of BCECF translation in cytoplasm could be quantitatively attributed to three independent factors: (a) fluid-phase cytoplasmic viscosity is 28% greater than the viscosity of water (factor 1 = 0.78); (b) 19% of BCECF is transiently bound to intracellular components of low mobility (factor 2 = 0.81); and most importantly, (c) translation of unbound BCECF is hindered 2.5-fold by collisions with cell solids comprising 13% of isosmotic cell volume (factor 3 = 0.40). The product of the 3 factors is 0.25 +/- 0.03, in good agreement with the measured D/D0 of 0.27 +/- 0.01. These results provide the first measurement of the translational mobility of a small solute in cell cytoplasm and define quantitatively the factors that slow solute translation.

Indexed as

3T3 CellsAnimalsBiological TransportColloidsCytoplasmDiffusionFluorescence PolarizationIn Vitro TechniquesMiceViscosityColloids

Identifiers

PMID8416987
PMCPMC2119503
OpenAlexW2110706129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.