Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8414901›Full record

ArticlePflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology1993

A two-step model of secretion control in neuroendocrine cells.

C Heinemann, L von Rüden, R H Chow, E Neher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Unraveling the mechanisms of calcium-dependent secretion.The Journal of general physiology · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. How does the stimulus define exocytosis in adrenal chromaffin cells?Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Data-driven modeling of synaptic transmission and integration.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C HeinemannMax-Planck-Institut für biophysikalische Chemie, Göttingen, Germany.
L von Rüden
R H Chow
E Neher

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent experiments on a variety of neuroendocrine cells indicate that intense stimuli readily depress the secretory response. The most likely explanation for this depression is that a pool of release-ready granules is depleted. We present a two-step model of secretion that allows one to simulate the dynamics of such a pool for different time courses of free intracellular Ca concentration [Ca2+]i. We derive rate constants of the model from two types of experiment and find that, for the simplest type of model, not only the rate of consumption (exocytosis) but also the rate of vesicle supply to the pool of release-ready granules must be made Ca-dependent. Given these functional dependences a variety of results from the literature can be simulated. In particular, the model predicts the occurrence of secretory depression and augmentation under appropriate conditions.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaffeineCalciumCattleCells, CulturedChromaffin SystemExocytosisKineticsModels, BiologicalNeurosecretionNeurosecretory SystemsCaffeineCalcium

Identifiers

PMID8414901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.