ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1993
Effect of RP 67580, a non-peptide neurokinin1 receptor antagonist, on facilitation of a nociceptive spinal flexion reflex in the rat.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanical Conflict System: A Novel Operant Method for the Assessment of Nociceptive Behavior.PloS one · 2016Article
- Evidence for the participation of glutamate in reflexes involving afferent, substance P-containing nerve fibres in the rat.British journal of pharmacology · 1996Article
- Antinociceptive activity of the tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonist, CP-99,994, in conscious gerbils.British journal of pharmacology · 1995Article
- Involvement of neurokinin receptors in the induction but not the maintenance of mechanical allodynia in rat flexor motoneurones.The Journal of physiology · 1995Article
- The non-peptide NK1 receptor antagonist SR140333 produces long-lasting inhibition of neurogenic inflammation, but does not influence acute chemo- or thermonociception in rats.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 1995Article
- Central versus peripheral site of action of the tachykinin NK1-antagonist RP 67580 in inhibiting chemonociception.British journal of pharmacology · 1995Article
- Effects of the tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonist, RP 67580, on central cardiovascular and behavioural effects of substance P, neurokinin A and neurokinin B.British journal of pharmacology · 1995Article
- Blockade by oral or parenteral RPR 100893 (a non-peptide NK1 receptor antagonist) of neurogenic plasma protein extravasation within guinea-pig dura mater and conjunctiva.British journal of pharmacology · 1994Article
- Antinociceptive activity of NK1 receptor antagonists: non-specific effects of racemic RP67580.British journal of pharmacology · 1993Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. In order to examine the contribution of neurokinin1 (NK1) receptors to facilitation of a spinal nociceptive reflex in the rat, we have investigated the effects of RP 67580 (3aR, 7aR)-7,7-diphenyl-2(1-imino-2-(2-methoxyphenyl/ethyl)perhydrois oindole)), a non-peptide neurokinin1 (NK1) receptor antagonist, selective for the rodent receptor sub-type, on the activity of individual motorunits. These results were compared with the effects of RP 68651, the inactive 3aS, 7aS enantiomer of RP 67580, as a control for non-specific activity. 2. Experiments were performed on 15 rats anaesthetized with a continuous i.v. infusion of alphaxalone/alphadalone and spinalized at T9-10. Single unit recordings of motorunit activity from biceps femoris/semitendinosus were made with a concentric needle electrode. In each experiment, a vehicle dose followed by 4 sequential rising doses of either RP 67580 or RP 68651 were given at 15 min intervals. High intensity electrical stimuli were applied to the hindlimb receptive field of the motorunit at a rate of 1 per 60 s throughout the experiment to establish a baseline. A conditioning stimulus (20 of these stimuli at 1 Hz) was delivered 5 min after each dose and the effect of the size of the baseline response examined. 3. The conditioning stimulus evoked a facilitation of the baseline at the start of all experiments (mean increase +/- s.e. mean = 151 +/- 20%). RP 67580 attenuated this facilitation, with an ID50 (+/- s.e. mean) of 2.5 +/- 4.2 micrograms kg-1, i.v., whereas RP 68651 at doses of up to 3 mg kg-1, i.v. did not. There was no statistically significant effect of drug on the baseline reflex, nor on the response to the conditioning stimulus. Doses of 300 and 3000 microg kg-1 of both RP 67580 and RP 68651 evoked small depressor effects on systemic arterial blood pressure.4. We conclude that the facilitation of a spinal flexor reflex by noxious conditioning stimuli in the rat is mediated by NK1 receptors whereas the baseline reflex is not. The results suggest that brain penetrantNK1 receptor antagonists may have central anti-nociceptive effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.