ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1993
The action of amlodipine on voltage-operated calcium channels in vascular smooth muscle.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- L-type calcium channel blockers at therapeutic concentrations are not linked to CRAC channels and heart failure.Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993) · 2025Article
- Distinct properties of amlodipine and nicardipine block of the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels Cav1.2 and Cav2.1 and the mutant channels Cav1.2/dihydropyridine insensitive and Cav2.1/dihydropyridine sensitive.European journal of pharmacology · 2011Article
- Molecular mechanisms of vasoselectivity of the 1,4-dihydropyridine lercanidipine.British journal of pharmacology · 2004Article
- Effects of protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors on voltage-operated calcium channel currents in vascular smooth muscle cells and pp60(c-src) kinase activity.British journal of pharmacology · 2000Article
- Binding constants determined from Ca2+ current responses to rapid applications and washouts of nifedipine in frog cardiac myocytes.The Journal of physiology · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Amlodipine, a dihydropyridine derivative largely ionized at physiological pH, inhibited calcium channel currents in single vascular smooth muscle cells isolated from rabbit ear artery in a concentration-dependent manner. 2. Amlodipine inhibited the current-voltage relationship for calcium channel currents across the range of test potentials used. However, the effect of amlodipine was more marked on more depolarized test potentials. Amlodipine also shifted the steady-state inactivation curve for calcium channel currents in a hyperpolarized direction. 3. The potency of amlodipine as determined from the steady-state inhibition of calcium channel current induced by the drug was dependent on the holding potential of the cells. Use of a more depolarized holding potential increased the potency of amlodipine. 4. Onset of amlodipine-induced inhibition was relatively rapid at both -60 mV and -40 mV holding potential. The use of a more depolarized holding potential increased the rate of association of amlodipine. No recovery from amlodipine-induced inhibition was seen over a 20 min period following washout of the drug. 5. In addition to voltage-dependence, the action of amlodipine showed use-dependence, in that the effect of amlodipine was more marked when calcium channel currents were evoked frequently. Increasing the frequency of activation of calcium channel currents did not alter the apparent onset rate of amlodipine-induced inhibition, but increased the degree of inhibition achieved by the drug. 6. The electrophysiological properties of amlodipine, particularly its voltage-dependence are probably important determinants of its action in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.