Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8387410›Full record

Trial reportClinical and experimental immunology1993

Serum and salivary responses to oral tetravalent reassortant rotavirus vaccine in newborns.

M G Friedman, B Segal, R Zedaka, B Sarov, M Margalith, R Bishop, R Dagan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and experimental immunology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rotavirus vaccine for preventing diarrhoea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M G FriedmanVirology Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
B Segal
R Zedaka
B Sarov
M Margalith
R Bishop
R Dagan
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev · ILThe Technological College of Beer Sheva · ILRoyal Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serum and salivary responses of 95 infants to either a standard (4 x 10(4) plaque-forming units (PFU), 47 neonates) or a high dose (4 x 10(5) PFU, 48 neonates) of tetravalent reassortant rhesus rotavirus vaccine (administered at 2 days and at 6 weeks of age) were evaluated in a double-blind clinical trial. Serum and salivary IgA antibodies to the rotavirus group A common antigen were determined by ELISA and radioimmunoassay (RIA). Serum neutralizing antibodies to rhesus rotavirus were determined by fluorescent focus reduction assay. No significant differences in responses to the high versus standard dose were noted in serum or saliva. Response was influenced by cord blood antibodies. All infants who were cord blood-negative for rhesus rotavirus neutralizing antibodies (nine who received the standard dose and 20 who received the higher dose) had serum responses, compared with 42-70% of those who were cord blood-positive. The serum response rate recorded for babies with cord blood neutralizing titres > 1000 was 44%. Infants being bottle fed had a higher serum response rate than did babies being breast fed exclusively. If serum and salivary responses were combined, the response rate reached 80% for bottle fed infants. Thus, determination of serum responses alone underestimates vaccine 'take' in infants, and more so in highly endemic areas than in areas subject only to sporadic outbreaks. However, determination of salivary responses in newborn breastfed infants may be inaccurate, due to possible persistence of antibodies derived from colostrum or breast milk.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralAntibody FormationDiarrhea, InfantileDose-Response Relationship, ImmunologicDouble-Blind MethodHumansImmunoglobulin AInfant, NewbornRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsSalivaViral VaccinesAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin AViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID8387410
PMCPMC1554811
OpenAlexW2004498184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.