Trial reportClinical and experimental immunology1993
Serum and salivary responses to oral tetravalent reassortant rotavirus vaccine in newborns.
Trial report in Clinical and experimental immunology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rotavirus vaccine for preventing diarrhoea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004Pooled it
- Thermostable, Dissolvable Buccal Film Rotavirus Vaccine Is Highly Effective in Neonatal Gnotobiotic Pig Challenge Model.Vaccines · 2021Article
- Decreased performance of live attenuated, oral rotavirus vaccines in low-income settings: causes and contributing factors.Expert review of vaccines · 2018Review
- Antibody secreting B cells and plasma antibody response to rotavirus vaccination in infants from Kolkata India.Heliyon · 2018Article
- Salivary Diagnostics in Pediatrics: Applicability, Translatability, and Limitations.Frontiers in public health · 2017Review
- Application of salivary antibody immunoassays for the detection of incident infections with Norwalk virus in a group of volunteers.Journal of immunological methods · 2015Article
- Importance of collection methods and stability of oral fluid samples for hepatitis B surface antigen detection.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2013Article
- Diagnosis of norwalk virus infection by indirect enzyme immunoassay detection of salivary antibodies to recombinant norwalk virus antigen.Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology · 2004Article
- Lack of maternal antibodies to P serotypes may predispose neonates to infections with unusual rotavirus strains.Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Serum and salivary responses of 95 infants to either a standard (4 x 10(4) plaque-forming units (PFU), 47 neonates) or a high dose (4 x 10(5) PFU, 48 neonates) of tetravalent reassortant rhesus rotavirus vaccine (administered at 2 days and at 6 weeks of age) were evaluated in a double-blind clinical trial. Serum and salivary IgA antibodies to the rotavirus group A common antigen were determined by ELISA and radioimmunoassay (RIA). Serum neutralizing antibodies to rhesus rotavirus were determined by fluorescent focus reduction assay. No significant differences in responses to the high versus standard dose were noted in serum or saliva. Response was influenced by cord blood antibodies. All infants who were cord blood-negative for rhesus rotavirus neutralizing antibodies (nine who received the standard dose and 20 who received the higher dose) had serum responses, compared with 42-70% of those who were cord blood-positive. The serum response rate recorded for babies with cord blood neutralizing titres > 1000 was 44%. Infants being bottle fed had a higher serum response rate than did babies being breast fed exclusively. If serum and salivary responses were combined, the response rate reached 80% for bottle fed infants. Thus, determination of serum responses alone underestimates vaccine 'take' in infants, and more so in highly endemic areas than in areas subject only to sporadic outbreaks. However, determination of salivary responses in newborn breastfed infants may be inaccurate, due to possible persistence of antibodies derived from colostrum or breast milk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.