ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1993
Protein kinase regulation of muscarinic receptor signalling in colonic smooth muscle.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Activation of MAP kinases and phosphorylation of caldesmon in canine colonic smooth muscle.The Journal of physiology · 1996Article
- Sensitization of the contractile system of canine colonic smooth muscle by agonists and phorbol ester.The Journal of physiology · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. We have previously demonstrated that M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors coexist in the circular smooth muscle of canine proximal colon. Activation of receptors of the M2 subtype leads to inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity through the GTP-binding protein, Gi, while M3 receptors are coupled to a pertussis toxin-insensitive GTP-binding protein and mediate phosphoinositide hydrolysis. 2. In the present study, the interactions between these second messenger systems were examined. Activation of either protein kinase C or adenosine 3':5'-cyclic monophosphate (cyclic AMP)-dependent protein kinase attenuated carbachol-stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis without affecting basal activity. Activation of both protein kinases produced greater attenuation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate formation than activation of either kinase alone. 3. In contrast to its inhibitory effect on phosphoinositide hydrolysis, activation of protein kinase C had no effect on adenylyl cyclase activity. 4. Activation of protein kinase C by phorbol ester treatment resulted in the sequestration of M3 muscarinic receptors from the cell surface without effecting the M2 muscarinic receptor population. Sequestered M3 muscarinic receptors were not rapidly degraded. 5. In contrast, elevation of cellular cyclic AMP decreased the affinity of cell surface muscarinic receptors for an antagonist radioligand without affecting their density. 6. Muscarinic agonist binding was not affected by either activation of protein kinase C or elevation of cellular cyclic AMP. 7. These data support the notion of negative feedback by protein kinase C and cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase on phosphoinositide hydrolysis. In canine colonic circular smooth muscle this negative feedback regulation of inositol phosphate generation by muscarinic receptor stimulation does not appear to involve the guanine nucleotide binding protein:receptor interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.