ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology1993
Do diuretics cause magnesium deficiency?
Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Renal sodium and magnesium reabsorption are not coupled in a mouse model of Gordon syndrome.Physiological reports · 2018Article
- Evidence of Drug-Nutrient Interactions with Chronic Use of Commonly Prescribed Medications: An Update.Pharmaceutics · 2018Review
- Increased expression of renal TRPM6 compensates for Mg(2+) wasting during furosemide treatment.Clinical kidney journal · 2012Article
- Drug-induced hypomagnesaemia : scope and management.Drug safety · 2005Review
- Serum magnesium aberrations in furosemide (frusemide) treated patients with congestive heart failure: pathophysiological correlates and prognostic evaluation.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2003Article
- Metabolic and clinical effects of oral magnesium supplementation in furosemide-treated patients with severe congestive heart failure.Clinical cardiology · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Controlled trials, of which there are few, do not substantiate claims that diuretics play a role in causing magnesium deficiency. Consequently, the vast majority of patients taking conventional doses of thiazide diuretics (i.e. bendrofluazide 2.5 mg day-1 or equivalent) do not need magnesium supplements. On balance, potassium-sparing diuretics tend to increase serum and intracellular magnesium content; this should not be taken as evidence of prior magnesium deficiency. It remains theoretically possible that large doses of loop diuretics given more than once daily for long periods could induce negative magnesium balance and magnesium deficiency. However, it has been difficult to run appropriately controlled trials in conditions where such therapy is needed (i.e. heart failure) and until more reliable information becomes available no absolute recommendation can be made. 2. Methods for the measurement of intracellular free magnesium levels are now available and are more relevant to the assessment of magnesium deficiency than total intracellular magnesium content; the complex relationship between intracellular free and total magnesium content remains to be defined. Future work involving the effect of diuretics on intracellular free magnesium measurements should make every attempt to avoid the errors of trial design and multiple publication that litter current and past literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.