ArticleHuman genetics1993
Cytogenetic, FISH and DNA studies in 11 individuals from a family with two siblings with dup(21q) Down syndrome.
Article in Human genetics, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A Spanish family has previously been described with two siblings with dup(21q) Down syndrome. The father has a normal karyotype. The mother has a microchromosome. Cytogenetic, fluorescence in situ hybridization and DNA studies have now been carried out on the family. Findings include that the mother has three different chromosome anomalies, viz. (1) a chromosome 22 with an unusual pericentromeric region that contains alphoid DNA from chromosomes 21/13 and chromosome 22, (2) an isochromosome 21p in the frequent cell line and (3) an isochromosome 21q in a rare second cell line. A possible explanation is that the mother developed from a zygote with trisomy 21 and that mitotic error in early development resulted in the formation of two cell lines with karyotypes of 47,XX,+i(21p) and 47,XX,+i(21q), respectively. The unusual chromosome 22 represents a hitherto undescribed chromosome anomaly and one possible explanation is a translocation of the short arms between chromosomes 21/13 and 22 in the ancestry of the family. The relationship between the unusual chromosome 22 and the isochromosome formation in the mother is not known. However, all three chromosome anomalies involve the alphoid DNA of chromosome 21/13, indicating that this is not a chance finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.