ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1993
Novel regulation of muscarinic receptors and their coupling with G proteins in smooth muscle: transient resensitization during desensitizing process.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Muscarinic stimulation of the smooth muscle of guinea-pig taenia caeci was produced with 10(-4) M carbachol for 15 s, 30 s, 1 min, 2 min and 30 min, and the time course of developing desensitization was studied by measuring the muscle contractility and the binding characteristics of muscarinic receptors. 2. The contractile response to carbachol was analyzed using dose-response curves. The response to 10(-7) M carbachol was reduced by treatment for 15 s with 10(-4) M carbachol (fast desensitization), but recovered partially after 30 s treatment and completely after 1 min treatment (resensitization). Contractility was reduced again after 2 min and 30 min treatment (re-desensitization). 3. The affinity of carbachol for muscarinic receptors was changed by the carbachol treatment in a manner similar to the contractility. Thus, the affinity was reduced at 15 s, restored slightly at 30 s and completely at 1 and 2 min, and was reduced again at 30 min. 4. 5'-Guanylylimidodiphosphate (GppNHp), a non-hydrolysable analogue of guanosine triphosphate (GTP) reduced the affinity of muscarinic receptors for carbachol via guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins (G proteins). A similar effect was observed in tissues desensitized by 15 s carbachol treatment. This effect disappeared after 30 s, recovered completely after 1 and 2 min, and disappeared again after 30 min carbachol treatment. 5. Neither the dissociation constant (Kd value) nor the maximal binding (Bmax) of [3H]-quinuclidinyl benzilate ([3H]-QNB) to muscarinic receptors were changed by the carbachol treatment. 6. These results indicate that the whole process of desensitization, resensitization and re-desensitization are related to changes in the binding ability of muscarinic receptors, in their coupling with G proteins and in the post-receptor steps of the signal transduction. We emphasize that the desensitizing process involves an early transient phase of resensitization that could be caused by restoration of both the affinity of carbachol for muscarinic receptors and their coupling with G proteins. This novel resensitization mechanism may have some physiological significance for cellular homoeostasis by modulating cellular responsiveness transiently or even in an oscillatory manner during the process of desensitization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.