ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology1993
Muscle strength and history of heavy manual work among elderly trained women and randomly chosen sample population.
Article in European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Voice and handgrip strength predict reproductive success in a group of indigenous African females.PloS one · 2012Trial
- Reference values for toe grip strength among Japanese adults aged 20 to 79 years: a cross-sectional study.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2014Article
- Age-related differences in muscular capacity among workers.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2009Article
- Exercise for the older woman: choosing the right prescription.British journal of sports medicine · 1997Review
- Physical workload and the aging worker: a review of the literature.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 1995Review
- Physical work load, physical capacity and strain among elderly female aides in home-care service.European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology · 1995Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The association between a history of heavy work and muscle strength was studied among 51 physically active women aged 66-85 years trained in sports and 41 women aged 70-81 years selected randomly from the population register. Maximal isometric muscle strength of hand grip, arm flexion, leg extension and trunk flexion and extension were measured using specially constructed dynamometers. The capacity of the abdominal muscles was evaluated by means of a sit-up test. The study included an interview dealing with the subjects' histories of heavy manual employment. The mean histories of heavy work for the trained and untrained women were 24 and 36 years, respectively. The trained women showed significantly greater maximal isometric muscle strength and abdominal muscle capacity than the untrained women. Among the trained women there was no correlation between the amount of heavy work and muscle performance. Among the untrained women the amount of heavy work correlated positively with maximal isometric trunk extension strength. The results would suggest that among elderly women, whether physically active or not, a history of heavy work has no systematic association with muscle strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.