ArticleTransgenic research1993
Regulation of expression of transgenes in developing fish.
Article in Transgenic research, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel model for development, organization, and function of gonadotropes in fish pituitary.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2014Article
- Isolation of yellow catfish β-actin promoter and generation of transgenic yellow catfish expressing enhanced yellow fluorescent protein.Transgenic research · 2012Article
- High transgene activity in the yolk syncytial layer affects quantitative transient expression assays in zebrafish Danio rerio) embryos.Transgenic research · 1996Article
- Regulation and expression of transgenes in fish -- a review.Transgenic research · 1996Review
- Fishing for answers with transposons.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)Review
- RecA-mediated, targeted mutagenesis in zebrafish.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The transcriptional regulatory elements of the beta-actin gene of carp (Cyprinus carpio) have been examined in zebrafish and goldfish harbouring transgenes. The high sequence conservation of the putative regulatory elements in the beta-actin genes of animals suggested that their function would be conserved, so that transgenic constructs with the same transcriptional control elements would promote similar levels of transgene expression in different species of transgenic animals. To test this assumption, we analysed the temporal expression of a reporter gene under the control of transcriptional control sequences from the carp beta-actin gene in zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio) and goldfish (Carrasius auratus). Our results indicated that, contrary to expectations, combinations of different transcriptional control elements affected the level, duration, and onset of gene expression differently in developing zebrafish and goldfish. The major differences in expression of beta-actin/CAT (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase) constructs in zebrafish and goldfish were: (1) overall expression was almost 100-fold higher in goldfish than in zebrafish embryos, (2) the first intron had an enhancing effect on gene expression in zebrafish but not in goldfish, and (3) the serum-responsive/CArG-containing regulatory element in the proximal promoter was not always required for maximal CAT activity in goldfish, but was required in zebrafish. These results suggest that in the zebrafish, but not in the goldfish, there may be interactions between motifs in the proximal promoter and the first intron which appear to be required for maximal enhancement of transcription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.