ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1993
Individual DNA identification from ancient human remains.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bibliometric analysis of kinship analysis from 1960 to 2023: global trends and development.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Pooled it
- Collagen of ancient bones gives an indication of endogenous DNA preservation based on next-generation sequencing technology.Anthropological science : journal of the Anthropological Society of Nippon = Jinruigaku zasshi · 2024Article
- Organic Extraction of Nucleic Acids Using Ethanol Precipitation or MicroconMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Extending the spectrum of DNA sequences retrieved from ancient bones and teeth.Genome research · 2017Article
- Mitochondrial DNA evidence for a diversified origin of workers building First Emperor of China.PloS one · 2008Article
- Distribution patterns of postmortem damage in human mitochondrial DNA.American journal of human genetics · 2003Article
- A simple and efficient method for PCR amplifiable DNA extraction from ancient bones.Nucleic acids research · 2000Article
- Molecular genetic analysis of remains of a 2,000-year-old human population in China-and its relevance for the origin of the modern Japanese population.American journal of human genetics · 1999Article
- Forensic evaluation of HUMCD4: an Italian database.International journal of legal medicine · 1996Article
- Human beta-globin gene polymorphisms characterized in DNA extracted from ancient bones 12,000 years old.American journal of human genetics · 1995Article
- Amplifying dinucleotide microsatellite loci from bone and tooth samples of up to 5000 years of age: more inconsistency than usefulness.Human genetics · 1995Article
- Comparison of DNA extraction and amplification from ancient human bone and mummified soft tissue.International journal of legal medicine · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individual identification of ancient human remains is one of the most fundamental requisites for studies of paleo-population genetics, including kinship among ancient people, intra- and interpopulation structures in ancient times, and the origin of human populations. However, knowledge of these subjects has been based mainly on circumstantial archaeological evidence for kinship and intrapopulation structure and on genetic studies of modern human populations. Here we describe individual identification of ancient humans by using short-nucleotide tandem repeats and mtDNAs as genetic markers. The application of this approach to kinship analysis shows clearly the presence or absence of kinship among the ancient remains examined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8352274PMC1682433W1662982009What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.