ArticleThe Journal of physiology1993
Spatial facilitation and depression within one motor nerve terminal of frogs.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ca2+-independent feedback inhibition of acetylcholine release in frog neuromuscular junction.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Perfused macropatch electrodes were used to stimulate and simultaneously measure release from two sites on the same terminal of the frog cutaneous pectoris muscle. 2. It was found that release occurring at one site often affected release at an adjacent site 50 microns away, either enhancing it ('spatial facilitation') or depressing it ('spatial depression'). Spatial facilitation (or depression) was defined as the release produced by a test pulse at the second site (test electrode) when preceded by a pulse at the first site (prepulse electrode) divided by the release produced by the test pulse alone. 3. Spatial facilitation varied with the time interval between the prepulse and the test pulse. Peak spatial facilitation, which on the average was 2.14, occurred with an interval of 1-3 ms. With longer intervals spatial facilitation decayed with a time constant between 3-6 ms. When the time interval between the prepulse and the test pulse was zero (no delay), the release after the test pulse was always depressed. 4. When Ca2+ was omitted from the perfusate of the prepulse electrode, spatial facilitation was abolished. When a brief hyperpolarizing pulse followed the depolarizing prepulse with zero delay spatial facilitation was also abolished. 5. Electrotonic spread or Ca2+ diffusion within the axon terminal are excluded as coupling agents for spatial facilitation. It is suggested that the coupling agent may possibly be related to a hypothetical release-promoting factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.