Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8349735›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology1993

Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism.

R V Skibbens, V P Skeen, E D Salmon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 197 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
197citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

197 citing papers in PubMed, 408 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Structure and function of the outer kinetochore.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The kinetochore corona orchestrates chromosome congression through transient microtubule interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ipsilateral restriction of chromosome movement along a centrosome, and apical-basal axis during the cell cycle.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Assessment of Chromosome Oscillations in Mammalian Cells by Live Cell Imaging.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mechanical coupling coordinates microtubule growth.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. The Axolotl's journey to the modern molecular era.Current topics in developmental biology · 2022
    Article

137 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R V SkibbensDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-3280.
V P Skeen
E D Salmon
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

MECHANISMS OF MITOTIC SPINDLE ASSEMBLY AND FUNCTIONR37GM024364 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SALMON, EDWARD D. · 2004 to 2013
$4.1M
MECHANISMS OF MITOTIC SPINDLE ASSEMBLY AND FUNCTIONR01GM024364 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BLOOM, KERRY S, SALMON, EDWARD D. · 1985 to 2018
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM24364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most models of mitotic congression and segregation assume that only poleward pulling forces occur at kinetochores. However, there are reports for several different cell types that both mono-oriented and bi-oriented chromosomes oscillate toward and away from the pole throughout mitosis. We used new methods of high resolution video microscopy and computer-assisted tracking techniques to measure the positions over time of individual kinetochores with respect to their poles during mitosis in living newt lung cells. The results show that kinetochores oscillate throughout mitosis when they are tethered to spindle poles by attachment to the plus-ends of kinetochore microtubules (kMTs). Oscillations were not sinusoidal. Instead, kinetochores abruptly (as quick as 6 s or less) switched between persistent (approximately 1.5 min average duration) phases of poleward (P) and away from the pole (AP) movement. This kinetochore "directional instability" was a property of motility at the plus-ends of kMTs since fluorescent marks on the lattice of kMTs have previously been observed to exhibit only relatively slow P movement. Each P and AP phase consisted of one or a few constant velocity domains (approximately 1.7 microns/min average velocity). Velocities of P and AP phases were similar from prometaphase through mid-anaphase. Kinetochores occasionally switched to an indeterminant (N) phase of no or confused motion, which was usually brief compared to the durations of P and AP phases. Net chromosome displacements that occurred during congression to the equator or poleward movement during anaphase were primarily generated by differences in the durations and not the velocities of P and AP movements. Careful analysis of centromere deformation showed that kinetochore P movement produced pulling forces while kinetochore AP movement produced pushing forces. These data show that kinetochore directional instability is fundamental to the processes of chromosome congression and segregation. We argue that tension at the kinetochore attachment site is a key factor which controls the switching between P and AP phases of kinetochore motion.

Indexed as

MitosisAnimalsCell MovementCentromereChromosomesIn Vitro TechniquesLungSalamandridaeVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID8349735
PMCPMC2119582
OpenAlexW2142128650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.