Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8349114›Full record

ArticleGenetics1993

Compositional heterogeneity and patterns of molecular evolution in the Drosophila genome.

J P Carulli, D E Krane, D L Hartl, H Ochman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Elevated evolutionary rates in the laboratory strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J P CarulliDepartment of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.
D E Krane
D L Hartl
H Ochman

Funding

TECHNICAL COREP50HG000750 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI RUBIN, GERALD M. · 1992 to 2002
$25.5M
MOSAIC STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF GENOMESR01GM048407 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI OCHMAN, HOWARD · 1993 to 1995
–
TRAINING PROGRAM IN VISION RESEARCHT32EY007108 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FRAZIER, WILLIAM A · 1988 to 1994
–
NEI NIH HHS EY07108NHGRI NIH HHS HG00750NIGMS NIH HHS GM-48407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rates and patterns of molecular evolution in many eukaryotic organisms have been shown to be influenced by the compartmentalization of their genomes into fractions of distinct base composition and mutational properties. We have examined the Drosophila genome to explore relationships between the nucleotide content of large chromosomal segments and the base composition and rate of evolution of genes within those segments. Direct determination of the G + C contents of yeast artificial chromosome clones containing inserts of Drosophila melanogaster DNA ranging from 140-340 kb revealed significant heterogeneity in base composition. The G + C content of the large segments studied ranged from 36.9% G + C for a clone containing the hunchback locus in polytene region 85, to 50.9% G + C for a clone that includes the rosy region in polytene region 87. Unlike other organisms, however, there was no significant correlation between the base composition of large chromosomal regions and the base composition at fourfold degenerate nucleotide sites of genes encompassed within those regions. Despite the situation seen in mammals, there was also no significant association between base composition and rate of nucleotide substitution. These results suggest that nucleotide sequence evolution in Drosophila differs from that of many vertebrates and does not reflect distinct mutational biases, as a function of base composition, in different genomic regions. Significant negative correlations between codon-usage bias and rates of synonymous site divergence, however, provide strong support for an argument that selection among alternative codons may be a major contributor to variability in evolutionary rates within Drosophila genomes.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenomeAnimalsBase CompositionChromosomes, FungalCodonDrosophila melanogasterGene LibrarySequence Analysis, DNACodon

Identifiers

PMID8349114
PMCPMC1205520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.