ArticleGenetics1993
Compositional heterogeneity and patterns of molecular evolution in the Drosophila genome.
Article in Genetics, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maximum-likelihood model averaging to profile clustering of site types across discrete linear sequences.PLoS computational biology · 2009Article
- Article
- Transition-transversion bias is not universal: a counter example from grasshopper pseudogenes.PLoS genetics · 2007Article
- Elevated evolutionary rates in the laboratory strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005Article
- Article
- Substitution rates in Drosophila nuclear genes: implications for translational selection.Genetics · 2001Article
- Article
- Switch in codon bias and increased rates of amino acid substitution in the Drosophila saltans species group.Genetics · 1999Article
- Natural selection and the frequency distributions of "silent" DNA polymorphism in Drosophila.Genetics · 1997Article
- Selection and methionine accumulation in the fat body protein 2 gene (FBP2), a duplicate of the Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) gene.Journal of molecular evolution · 1997Article
- Article
- Synonymous substitutions in the Xdh gene of Drosophila: heterogeneous distribution along the coding region.Genetics · 1996Article
- Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.Genetics · 1995Article
- The effects of mutation and natural selection on codon bias in the genes of Drosophila.Genetics · 1994Article
- Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy.Genetics · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rates and patterns of molecular evolution in many eukaryotic organisms have been shown to be influenced by the compartmentalization of their genomes into fractions of distinct base composition and mutational properties. We have examined the Drosophila genome to explore relationships between the nucleotide content of large chromosomal segments and the base composition and rate of evolution of genes within those segments. Direct determination of the G + C contents of yeast artificial chromosome clones containing inserts of Drosophila melanogaster DNA ranging from 140-340 kb revealed significant heterogeneity in base composition. The G + C content of the large segments studied ranged from 36.9% G + C for a clone containing the hunchback locus in polytene region 85, to 50.9% G + C for a clone that includes the rosy region in polytene region 87. Unlike other organisms, however, there was no significant correlation between the base composition of large chromosomal regions and the base composition at fourfold degenerate nucleotide sites of genes encompassed within those regions. Despite the situation seen in mammals, there was also no significant association between base composition and rate of nucleotide substitution. These results suggest that nucleotide sequence evolution in Drosophila differs from that of many vertebrates and does not reflect distinct mutational biases, as a function of base composition, in different genomic regions. Significant negative correlations between codon-usage bias and rates of synonymous site divergence, however, provide strong support for an argument that selection among alternative codons may be a major contributor to variability in evolutionary rates within Drosophila genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.