Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8346130›Full record

GuidelinePostgraduate medical journal1993

Management of hyperlipidaemia: guidelines of the British Hyperlipidaemia Association.

D J Betteridge, P M Dodson, P N Durrington, E A Hughes, M F Laker, D P Nicholls, J A Rees, C A Seymour, G R Thompson, A F Winder

Open access · bronzeAbstract readGuidelinePractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Postgraduate medical journal, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CORONARY RISK ANALYSIS - A STITCH IN TIME.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2002
    Article
  8. The current status of primary prevention in coronary heart disease.Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine · 2001
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observed changes in the lipid profile and calculated coronary risk in patients given dietary advice in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Management of lipids in the elderly.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 1998
    Review
  18. Intensive cardiovascular risk factor intervention in a rural practice: a glimmer of hope?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

D J BetteridgeDepartment of Medicine, University College London Medical School, UK.
P M Dodson
P N Durrington
E A Hughes
M F Laker
D P Nicholls
J A Rees
C A Seymour
G R Thompson
A F Winder
University College London · GBNewcastle University · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBSandwell General Hospital · GBSt George's, University of London · GBThe Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is considerable evidence to suggest that the identification and treatment of dyslipidaemia will reduce the risk of premature CHD, i.e. before the age of 65. Diagnosis of the cause of raised plasma lipid levels will enable appropriate decisions to be taken with regard to management. The cornerstone of treatment is nutritional counselling and attention to other major risk factors for CHD, particularly smoking and hypertension. For a small percentage of patients with severe hyperlipidaemia drug therapy is indicated. Appropriate drug choices need to be made based on the particular lipid abnormality to be treated. In general those patients with clinical vascular disease are treated more aggressively than those where the aim is primary prevention. More research is needed to determine individual risk more precisely and to allow proper targeting of therapy. Genetic factors, qualitative changes in lipoproteins, lipoprotein (a), fibrinogen, and other coagulation and thrombotic factors are likely to be important in individual risk assessment. There is no doubt that more information is needed from prospective studies of lipid-lowering therapy in terms of risk benefit for affected individuals. Hopefully the major studies currently underway will fill some of the gaps in our knowledge. Until then aggressive therapy with drugs should be reserved for those at highest risk where the benefit is likely to be greatest.

Indexed as

Cholesterol, DietaryCoronary DiseaseDietFatty Acids, Omega-3FemaleHumansHyperlipidemiasLife StyleMaleMass ScreeningNicotinic AcidsProbucolRisk FactorsCholesterol, DietaryFatty Acids, Omega-3Nicotinic AcidsProbucol

Identifiers

PMID8346130
PMCPMC2399810
OpenAlexW2066190294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.