Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8344572›Full record

ArticleGut1993

Measurement of bicarbonate output from the intact human oesophagus.

C M Brown, C F Snowdon, B Slee, L N Sandle, W D Rees

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C M BrownDepartment of Medicine, Hope Hospital, University of Manchester School of Medicine.
C F Snowdon
B Slee
L N Sandle
W D Rees
Salford Royal Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injury of the oesophageal mucosa can result from exposure to refluxed gastric acid and pepsin. Competence of the lower oesophageal sphincter and peristaltic activity serve to reduce contract time between luminal acid and oesophageal mucosa, but intraluminal neutralisation of residual acid by bicarbonate may also be important in preventing oesophageal mucosal injury. Whereas swallowed saliva contains bicarbonate, recent experiments have also demonstrated alkali secretion from the mammalian oesophagus. Bicarbonate secretion from the human oesophagus was therefore examined with an intubation technique and perfusion of the oesophagus with a non-absorbable marker. Saliva, gastric, and oesophageal aspirates were collected and bicarbonate concentrations determined by measurements of pH and pCO2 or by back titration. In 32 normal subjects (17 women, 15 men) median basal oesophageal bicarbonate secretion determined by a pH/pCO2 method was 416 (range 139-1050) mumol/hour/10 cm. In a subgroup of 15 experiments median oesophageal bicarbonate output was 489 (range 157-1033) mumol/hour/10 cm (pH/pCO2 method) compared with a median alkali output of 563 (range 135-799) mumol/hour/10 cm as determined by back titration. The difference was not significant. Salivary contamination of the oesophagus accounted for 25% of all bicarbonate measured within the oesophagus and refluxed gastric bicarbonate accounted for 2.5%. Bicarbonate secretion from the normal human oesophagus may, in combination with swallowed salivary bicarbonate, play a part in preventing oesophageal mucosal damage due to refluxed gastric acid and pepsin.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBicarbonatesBiopsy, NeedleEsophagusFemaleGastric JuiceGastroesophageal RefluxHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleMucous MembraneSalivaBicarbonates

Identifiers

PMID8344572
PMCPMC1374218
OpenAlexW2079789850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.