ReviewAnnals of hematology1993
Diagnosis of invasive mycoses in severely immunosuppressed patients.
Review in Annals of hematology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aerosol amphotericin B inhalations for prevention of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in neutropenic cancer patients.Annals of hematology · 1995Trial
- Molecular and nonmolecular diagnostic methods for invasive fungal infections.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2014Review
- Preparation and evaluation of inhalable itraconazole chitosan based polymeric micelles.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2012Article
- [Serological tests for diagnosing fungal infections].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2007Article
- [Preventive antimycotic therapy of neutropenic and immunosuppressed patients].Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983) · 1997Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In compromised patients, invasive mycoses are being observed at an increasing frequency and with a broadening spectrum of causative fungi. The rapid and definitive diagnosis of such opportunistic mycoses requires the synoptical consideration of predisposing clinical conditions, of culture isolates, and of the results of nonculture techniques. At present, the latter comprise the monitoring of specific antibodies and of fungal antigens, and the microscopical examination of suspected biopsies. The validity of the individual techniques (e.g., the monitoring of antibodies or antigens) varies with individual mycoses. Alternative methods for monitoring fungal metabolites or nucleic acids are still in the developmental stage. Particularly the amplification of DNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has a high diagnostic potential. However, at present, it is uncertain whether PCR allows the necessary distinction between colonization and truly invasive infection, and whether PCR can be simplified sufficiently to allow the continuous surveillance of high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8334194What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.