Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8333150›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv. A, Pathological anatomy and histopathology1993

Morphometric analysis of small intestinal mucosa. IV. Determining cell volumes.

P T Crowe, M N Marsh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv. A, Pathological anatomy and histopathology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Diagnosing celiac disease: A critical overview.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Coeliac disease, mucosal change and IEL: doing what counts the best.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2016
    Article
  11. What is the best histopathological classification for celiac disease? Does it matter?Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P T CroweUniversity Department of Medicine, Hope Hospital, Greater Manchester, UK.
M N Marsh
Salford Royal Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was concerned with the measurement of volumes of surface epithelial cells in human small intestine, both in disease-control subjects and, for comparison, in patients with gluten sensitivity. Four procedures were employed, of which two were geometrical, based on cylindrical or truncated conoid models. The third method evolved from the proportionality of area to volume, and required determination of cellular and nuclear profile areas, and an estimation of nuclear volume based on models conforming to (1) a prolate spheroid, or (2) a cylinder with hemispherical caps. This procedure appeared to underestimate enterocyte volumes and failed to reveal volume differences between controls and gluten-sensitive individuals. Finally, a fourth method was devised, based on traditional intraepithelial profile counts per hundred enterocyte nuclei, calculation of surface epithelial volume and of the absolute number of lymphocytes contained therein. Enterocyte volumes appeared to be overestimated twofold by this procedure compared with the first two geometric methods. The results of this study indicate that the cuboidal-type enterocyte profiles typical of the untreated mucosa in gluten sensitivity are a reflection of cells with a reduced volume. From the number of enterocytes and the absolute lymphocyte population present within a morphometrically defined volume of surface epithelium, the ratios of intraepithelial lymphocytes to enterocytes were found to be 50% less than conventional density-profile counts.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleGlutensHumansIntestinal MucosaIntestine, SmallLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalGlutens

Identifiers

PMID8333150
OpenAlexW2018034985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.