Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8328459›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1993

Characterization of supernumerary ring marker chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

E Blennow, G Annerén, T H Bui, E Berggren, E Asadi, M Nordenskjöld

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Stability of monocentric and dicentric ring minichromosomes in Arabidopsis.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2011
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Reverse painting highlights the origin of chromosome aberrations.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2004
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Multiplex-FISH for pre- and postnatal diagnostic applications.American journal of human genetics · 1999
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E BlennowDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
G Annerén
T H Bui
E Berggren
E Asadi
M Nordenskjöld

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Five cases with small supernumerary ring chromosomes are characterized at the molecular level. Routine chromosome banding analysis was insufficient for identification of the ring chromosomes, and none of them was DA/DAPI positive. Fluorescence in situ hybridization utilizing repetitive centromeric probes for all chromosomes has determined that one of these five ring chromosomes originates in each of chromosomes 4, 7, 8, 9, and 20. Chromosome painting with chromosome-specific libraries has confirmed this and excluded the involvement of additional chromosomes in the rearrangements.

Indexed as

Genetic MarkersRing ChromosomesAbnormalities, MultipleAdultChild, PreschoolChromosome AberrationsChromosome DisordersChromosomes, Human, Pair 20Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8Chromosomes, Human, Pair 9FemaleHoloprosencephalyHumansInfantGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID8328459
PMCPMC1682354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.