ArticleVirchows Archiv. A, Pathological anatomy and histopathology1993
Cathepsin-D expression in cervical carcinoma and its prognostic significance.
Article in Virchows Archiv. A, Pathological anatomy and histopathology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunohistochemical detection of nm23/NDP kinase and cathepsin D in medullary carcinomas of the thyroid gland.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 1995Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An immunohistochemical study was made of cathepsin-D protein expression in each of the three main types of uterine cervical carcinoma (squamous carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma) with particular reference to lymph node status and prognosis. Of the 61 cases, 54.1% showed cytoplasmic staining in more than 2.5% of tumour cells counted. Cathepsin-D expression was significantly higher in adenocarcinoma (mean -3.128) than in squamous carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma (mean -3.709, p = 0.047 using logit transformation). Cathepsin-D had no prognostic value in any of the three tumour types. No relationship was found between cathepsin-D staining and lymph node status and there was no advantage in adding cathepsin-D values to lymph node status. These results suggest that immunostaining for cathepsin-D protein expression is unlikely to be of use as a prognostic marker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.