Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8318354›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN1993

Neuropeptides as growth and differentiation factors in general and VIP in particular.

I Gozes, D E Brenneman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mapping the active site in vasoactive intestinal peptide to a core of four amino acids: neuroprotective drug design.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1999
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Neuroprotective strategy for Alzheimer disease: intranasal administration of a fatty neuropeptide.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1996
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

I GozesDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
D E Brenneman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the course of neurodevelopment a large population of neurons die normally (Berg, 1982; Oppenheim et al., 1989). Are neuropeptides involved in the regulation of neuronal survival, maturation, and maintenance? The peptides are an ever growing family of neuroactive agents and this review shall emphasize VIP (vasoactive intestinal peptide [Said and Mutt, 1970; Gozes and Brenneman, 1989]), which has been shown to be involved in maturation, growth, and maintenance of neurons (Brenneman et al., 1985a, 1987, 1988, 1990, 1990b; Brenneman and Eiden, 1986; Brenneman and Nelson, 1986). Comparative actions of other neuropeptides will also be discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisCell DifferentiationCell DivisionGene Expression RegulationGrowthGrowth SubstancesNeuronsNeuropeptidesRatsVasoactive Intestinal PeptideGrowth SubstancesNeuropeptidesVasoactive Intestinal Peptide

Identifiers

PMID8318354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.