ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility1993
Persistent mechanical effects of decreasing length during isometric contraction of ovarian ligament smooth muscle.
Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Mechanisms for the Mechanical Modulation of Airway Responsiveness.Journal of engineering and science in medical diagnostics and therapy · 2019Article
- Actin cytoskeletal dynamics in smooth muscle: a new paradigm for the regulation of smooth muscle contraction.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2008Review
- Actin polymerization stimulated by contractile activation regulates force development in canine tracheal smooth muscle.The Journal of physiology · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When isometrically-contracting strips of ovarian ligament smooth muscle were suddenly shortened by 10-20% of their length, force fell rapidly and then redeveloped along an exponential time course. The amount of force recovered fell short of that expected in an isometric contraction at the new length, and this force deficit was proportional to the magnitude of the length step (approximately 80% of force was recovered after a 10% shortening). A sudden imposed decrease in length was more effective in reducing subsequent force than was isotonic shortening. Early in the recovery phase the stiffness of the muscle was decreased to less than its expected value; stiffness recovered to expected levels on an exponential time course approximately three to four times faster than force recovery itself. Force-velocity curves made during the redevelopment phase showed a reduced maximal force (Fmax) and an increased maximal shortening velocity (Vmax) when compared with control contractions matched in force, time and length. The curves crossed at approximately 10% of Fmax. During isometric relaxation the muscles showed an increase in their expected stiffness; prior imposed shortening (as above) reduced the relaxation stiffness increase in proportion to the prior force deficit. The persistent effects of early events on the later phases of the contraction, as well as the increase in shortening velocity with very light loads, are consistent with the hypothesis that the sudden shortening detaches crossbridges and that same fail to reattach during force recovery. During isotonic shortening of unperturbed muscle some slowly-cycling crossbridges may act as an internal load and reduce shortening velocity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.