Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8312481›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1993

Fluorescence photobleaching with spatial Fourier analysis: measurement of diffusion in light-scattering media.

D A Berk, F Yuan, M Leunig, R K Jain

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tunable control of antibody immobilization using electric field.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D A BerkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114.
F Yuan
M Leunig
R K Jain
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

MOLECULAR MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVED DELIVERY IN TUMORSF32CA059255 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BERK, DAVID A · 1992 to 1994
–
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF EXPERIMENTAL AND HUMAN TUMORSR35CA056591 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JAIN, RAKESH K. · 1993 to 1999
–
NCI NIH HHS CA56591NCI NIH HHS CA59255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new method for the measurement of diffusion in thick samples is introduced, based upon the spatial Fourier analysis of Tsay and Jacobson (Biophys. J. 60: 360-368, 1991) for the video image analysis of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). In this approach, the diffusion coefficient is calculated from the decay of Fourier transform coefficients in successive fluorescence images. Previously, the application of FRAP in thick samples has been confounded by the optical effects of out-of-focus light and scattering and absorption by the sample. The theory of image formation is invoked to show that the decay rate is the same for both the observed fluorescence intensity and the true concentration distribution in the tissue. The method was tested in a series of macromolecular diffusion measurements in aqueous solution, in agarose gel, and in simulated tissue consisting of tumor cells (45% v/v) and blood cells (5% v/v) in an agarose gel. For a range of fluorescently labeled proteins (MW = 14 to 600 kD) and dextrans (MW = 4.4 to 147.8 kD), the diffusion coefficients in aqueous solution were comparable to previously published values. A comparison of the spatial Fourier analysis with a conventional direct photometric method revealed that even for the weakly scattering agarose sample, the conventional method gives a result that is inaccurate and dependent on sample thickness whereas the diffusion coefficient calculated by the spatial Fourier method agreed with published values and was independent of sample thickness. The diffusion coefficient of albumin in the simulated tissue samples, as determined by the spatial Fourier analysis, varied slightly with sample thickness. In contrast, when the same video images were analyzed by direct photometric analysis, the calculated diffusion coefficients were grossly inaccurate and highly dependent on sample thickness. No simple correction could be devised to ensure the accuracy of the direct photometric method of analysis.These in vitro experiments demonstrate the advantage of our new analysis for obtaining an accurate measure of the local diffusion coefficient in microscopic samples that are thick (thickness greater than the microscope depth of focus) and scatter light.

Indexed as

Fourier AnalysisBiopolymersBlood ProteinsDiffusionHumansLightMathematicsModels, BiologicalNeoplasm ProteinsProteinsScattering, RadiationSepharoseSpectrometry, FluorescenceBiopolymersBlood ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsProteinsSepharose

Identifiers

PMID8312481
PMCPMC1225983
OpenAlexW2022130011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.