ArticleActa neuropathologica1993
Spinal cord-notochord relationship in normal human embryos and in a human embryo with double spinal cord.
Article in Acta neuropathologica, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organizers in a dish: Modeling human CNS morphogenesis.Developmental cell · 2026Review
- Differences in origin and fate between the cranial and caudal spinal cord during normal and disturbed human development.Acta neuropathologica · 1996Article
- Localisation of extracellular matrix components in the embryonic human notochord and axial mesenchyme.Journal of anatomy · 1995Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord-notochord relationship was analyzed histologically and immunohistochemically in normal human conceptuses between the 4-8 developmental weeks and in a 8-week embryo with double spinal cord. In the early 4-week embryo, the gradual closure of the neural tube along the cranio-caudal body axis was paralleled by the differentiation of the median hindge point cells at the ventral midline of the tube and by its temporary close association with the notochord. During the 5th-8th developmental weeks, the neuroepithelium differentiating into three distinct layers was accompanied by a solid, ventromedially positioned notochord. In the abnormal 8-week embryo, the additional spinal cord was located ventrolaterally from the vertebral column. Both spinal cords appeared bilaterally asymmetric, with their floor and roof plates irregularly formed. An abnormally enhanced pattern of neuroepithelial differentiation characterized their dorsal parts. Furthermore, additional spinal nerves and ganglia and an abnormal bony structure were associated with the spinal cord positioned outside the vertebral column. The underlying vertebral bodies were misshaped and contained scattered supernumerary groups of notochord cells. Our investigation underlines the importance of the notochord-neural tube relationship in the morphogenesis of the spinal cord. We suggest that the double spinal cord was induced by the split notochord.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8310800What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.